Why Are Self-Report and Behavioral Measures Weakly Correlated?

Junhua Dang; Kevin M. King; Michael Inzlicht

doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.007

Why Are Self-Report and Behavioral Measures Weakly Correlated?

Junhua Dang
, Kevin M. King
, Michael Inzlicht

Uppsala University
University of Washington
University of Toronto

科研成果: 期刊稿件 › 短篇评述 › 同行评审

546 引用（Scopus）

摘要

Accumulating evidence indicates weak correlations between self-report and behavioral measures of the same construct. We suggest that these weak correlations result from the poor reliability of many behavioral measures and the distinct response processes involved in the two measurement types. We also describe how researchers can benefit from appropriate use of these measures.

源语言	英语
页（从-至）	267-269
页数	3
期刊	Trends in Cognitive Sciences
卷	24
期	4
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.007
出版状态	已出版 - 4月 2020
已对外发布	是

访问文件

10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.007

其它文件与链接

链接到 Scopus 的出版物

引用此

@article{3e9133ea65c14d4faccf5ef77c275932,

title = "Why Are Self-Report and Behavioral Measures Weakly Correlated?",

abstract = "Accumulating evidence indicates weak correlations between self-report and behavioral measures of the same construct. We suggest that these weak correlations result from the poor reliability of many behavioral measures and the distinct response processes involved in the two measurement types. We also describe how researchers can benefit from appropriate use of these measures.",

keywords = "between-person variability, jingle-jangle fallacy, reliability paradox",

author = "Junhua Dang and King, \{Kevin M.\} and Michael Inzlicht",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Elsevier Ltd",

year = "2020",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.007",

language = "英语",

volume = "24",

pages = "267--269",

journal = "Trends in Cognitive Sciences",

issn = "1364-6613",