TY - JOUR
T1 - Vortex Structure Topology Analysis of the Transonic Rotor 37 Based on Large Eddy Simulation
AU - Li, Kunhang
AU - Tang, Pengbo
AU - Meng, Fanjie
AU - Guo, Penghua
AU - Li, Jingyin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Highly three–dimensional and complex flow structures are closely related to the aerodynamic losses occurring in the transonic axial–flow compressor. The large eddy simulation (LES) approach was adopted to study the aerodynamic performance of the NASA rotor 37 for the cases at the design, the near stall (NS), and the near choke (NC) flow rate. The internal flow vortex topology was analyzed by the Q–criterion method, the omega (Ω) vortex identification method, and the Liutex identification method. It was observed that the Q–criterion method was vulnerable to being influenced by the flow with high–shear deformation rate, especially near the end–wall regions. The Ω method was adopted to recognize the three–dimensional vortex structure with a higher precision than that of the Q–criterion method. Meanwhile, the Liutex vortex identification method showed a good performance in vortex identification, and the corresponding contribution of Liutex components in the vortex topology was analyzed. The results show that the high–vortex fields around the separation line and reattachment line had high vortex components in the x–axis, the tip clearance vortices presented a high–vortex component in the y–axis, and the suction side corner vortex possessed high–vortex components in the y– and z–axes.
AB - Highly three–dimensional and complex flow structures are closely related to the aerodynamic losses occurring in the transonic axial–flow compressor. The large eddy simulation (LES) approach was adopted to study the aerodynamic performance of the NASA rotor 37 for the cases at the design, the near stall (NS), and the near choke (NC) flow rate. The internal flow vortex topology was analyzed by the Q–criterion method, the omega (Ω) vortex identification method, and the Liutex identification method. It was observed that the Q–criterion method was vulnerable to being influenced by the flow with high–shear deformation rate, especially near the end–wall regions. The Ω method was adopted to recognize the three–dimensional vortex structure with a higher precision than that of the Q–criterion method. Meanwhile, the Liutex vortex identification method showed a good performance in vortex identification, and the corresponding contribution of Liutex components in the vortex topology was analyzed. The results show that the high–vortex fields around the separation line and reattachment line had high vortex components in the x–axis, the tip clearance vortices presented a high–vortex component in the y–axis, and the suction side corner vortex possessed high–vortex components in the y– and z–axes.
KW - NASA rotor 37
KW - large eddy simulation
KW - vortex identification methods
KW - vortex structure topology analysis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85151474969
U2 - 10.3390/machines11030334
DO - 10.3390/machines11030334
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85151474969
SN - 2075-1702
VL - 11
JO - Machines
JF - Machines
IS - 3
M1 - 334
ER -