跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

Thermodynamic analysis of two-step electro-thermochemical cycle versus two-step thermochemical cycle for solar H2O splitting: A comparative study

  • Heng Pan
  • , Yuhao Zhao
  • , Chuang Wang
  • , Yihang Li
  • , Youjun Lu
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University
  • Xidian University

科研成果: 期刊稿件文章同行评审

8 引用 (Scopus)

摘要

Two-step thermochemical cycle (TSTC) is a promising approach for solar-driven H2O splitting. However, extremely high reduction temperature (Tred) is a key challenge limiting the development of TSTC. Two-step electro-thermochemical cycle (TSEC) has recently emerged to overcome this problem. However, the pros and cons of TSEC and TSTC are under debate. In this paper, a thermodynamic model was developed for studying the thermodynamic fundamentals and the variation rules of energy efficiency of TSEC and TSTC. The thermodynamic mechanisms of TSTC and TSEC were compared using the Gibbs free energy method and the Exergy & energy level analysis method. In comparison to TSTC, TSEC tends to operate at a lower Tred, enabling isothermal operation at moderate temperatures (<1473 K) while sustaining a high H2O conversion rate. In addition, energy efficiency analysis reveals that the introduction of 0.2 V auxiliary voltage can increase the energy efficiency from 0.25 in TSTC to 0.38 in TSEC, showing the advantage of TSEC for H2O splitting in terms of energy efficiency. This study analyses the advantages and disadvantages of TSTC and TSEC for H2O splitting, demonstrating a reference for further development of solar-driven H2O splitting.

源语言英语
页(从-至)1222-1229
页数8
期刊International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
71
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 19 6月 2024

联合国可持续发展目标

此成果有助于实现下列可持续发展目标:

  1. 可持续发展目标 7 - 经济适用的清洁能源
    可持续发展目标 7 经济适用的清洁能源

学术指纹

探究 'Thermodynamic analysis of two-step electro-thermochemical cycle versus two-step thermochemical cycle for solar H2O splitting: A comparative study' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的学术指纹。

引用此