跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

Thermal/optical methods for elemental carbon quantification in soils and urban dusts: Equivalence of different analysis protocols

  • Yongming Han
  • , Antony Chen
  • , Junji Cao
  • , Kochy Fung
  • , Fai Ho
  • , Beizhan Yan
  • , Changlin Zhan
  • , Suixin Liu
  • , Chong Wei
  • , Zhisheng An
  • CAS - Institute of Earth Environment
  • Columbia University
  • Desert Research Institute
  • AtmAA Inc.
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong

科研成果: 期刊稿件文章同行评审

10 引用 (Scopus)

摘要

Quantifying elemental carbon (EC) content in geological samples is challenging due to interferences of crustal, salt, and organic material. Thermal/optical analysis, combined with acid pretreatment, represents a feasible approach. However, the consistency of various thermal/optical analysis protocols for this type of samples has never been examined. In this study, urban street dust and soil samples from Baoji, China were pretreated with acids and analyzed with four thermal/optical protocols to investigate how analytical conditions and optical correction affect EC measurement. The EC values measured with reflectance correction (ECR) were found always higher and less sensitive to temperature program than the EC values measured with transmittance correction (ECT). A high-temperature method with extended heating times (STN120) showed the highest ECT/ECR ratio (0.86) while a low-temperature protocol (IMPROVE-550), with heating time adjusted for sample loading, showed the lowest (0.53). STN ECT was higher than IMPROVE ECT, in contrast to results from aerosol samples. A higher peak inert-mode temperature and extended heating times can elevate ECT/ECR ratios for pretreated geological samples by promoting pyrolyzed organic carbon (PyOC) removal over EC under trace levels of oxygen. Considering that PyOC within filter increases ECR while decreases ECT from the actual EC levels, simultaneous ECR and ECT measurements would constrain the range of EC loading and provide information on method performance. Further testing with standard reference materials of common environmental matrices supports the findings. Char and soot fractions of EC can be further separated using the IMPROVE protocol. The char/soot ratio was lower in street dusts (2.2 on average) than in soils (5.2 on average), most likely reflecting motor vehicle emissions. The soot concentrations agreed with EC from CTO-375, a pure thermal method.

源语言英语
文章编号e83462
期刊PLoS ONE
8
12
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 17 12月 2013
已对外发布

学术指纹

探究 'Thermal/optical methods for elemental carbon quantification in soils and urban dusts: Equivalence of different analysis protocols' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的学术指纹。

引用此