跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

The responses of microbial extracellular enzyme activities to soil sample storage conditions across different soil types

  • Panpan Liu
  • , Jiacong Zhou
  • , Chris Freeman
  • , Mallavarapu Megharaj
  • , Kyungjin Min
  • , Linchuan Fang
  • , Gangsheng Wang
  • , Lars Elsgaard
  • , Nicolas Fanin
  • , Hojeong Kang
  • , Taiki Mori
  • , Jianwei Li
  • , Daryl L. Moorhead
  • , Yongxing Cui
  • , Yangyang Li
  • , Dong Wang
  • , Zhao Jin
  • , Xiaojun Shi
  • , Ji Chen
  • Southwest University
  • CAS - Institute of Earth Environment
  • Bangor University
  • University of Newcastle
  • Seoul National University
  • Wuhan University of Technology
  • Wuhan University
  • Aarhus University
  • INRAE
  • North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power
  • Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute
  • Tennessee State University
  • University of Toledo
  • Peking University
  • Free University of Berlin
  • Henan University
  • School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering
  • Guanzhong Plain Ecological Environment Change and Comprehensive Treatment National Observation and Research Station

科研成果: 期刊稿件文章同行评审

摘要

Storage at −20 °C optimally preserves hydrolytic enzyme activities in all soils. Oxidative enzyme responses to storage conditions are highly soil-specific. Storage dictates hydrolytic activity, while climate drives oxidative enzymes. Tailoring storage protocols to soil and enzyme types ensures cross-study comparability. Microbial extracellular enzymes are key indicators of soil biogeochemical functioning, yet their sensitivity to storage conditions remains unclear and limits cross-study comparability. We evaluated how three storage conditions (−20 °C, air-drying, and freeze-drying) affect hydrolytic and oxidative enzyme activities across forest soils spanning an acidic-to-alkaline pH gradient in China (Acrisols, Luvisols, and Calcisols). Storage at −20 °C consistently preserved higher hydrolytic activities, whereas air-drying and freeze-drying caused significant reductions across all soils. Conversely, oxidative enzymes showed soil-specific responses: -20 °C was optimal for Acrisols; both -20 °C and freeze-drying outperformed air-drying in Luvisols; while storage conditions little affected Calcisols. Multivariate analysis revealed that, although both enzyme types were influenced by key soil properties (e.g., pH, carbon, nutrients), their primary drivers differed. Hydrolytic activities were predominantly governed by storage conditions, whereas oxidative activities were mainly regulated by climatic factors (temperature and precipitation). These findings underscore the necessity of tailoring storage protocols to specific soil and enzyme types. Standardizing and explicitly reporting these conditions will improve the reproducibility of enzyme assays, providing a robust methodological foundation for future ecological research.

源语言英语
期刊论文编号260480
期刊Soil Ecology Letters
8
6
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 12月 2026
已对外发布

联合国可持续发展目标

此成果有助于实现下列可持续发展目标:

  1. 可持续发展目标 13 - 气候行动
    可持续发展目标 13 气候行动

学术指纹

探究 'The responses of microbial extracellular enzyme activities to soil sample storage conditions across different soil types' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的学术指纹。

引用此