TY - JOUR
T1 - The interrelationship of TMJ morphology, craniofacial structure, and airway dimensions in patients with disc displacement
AU - Osama, Almustafa
AU - Zhang, Hai Juan
AU - Musa, Mazen
AU - Nasih, Mahmoud
AU - Zheng, Cheng Dong
AU - Ren, Yu Han
AU - Wang, Shuang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026.
PY - 2026/12
Y1 - 2026/12
N2 - Background: This study aimed to comprehensively analyse the interrelationships between temporomandibular joint (TMJ) morphology, craniofacial skeletal patterns, and oropharyngeal airway dimensions in patients with TMJ disc displacement (TMJ DD). Methodology: Based on the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and subsequent MRI confirmation, this retrospective study included 91 adult patients with TMD DD. These patients were then categorized into three groups.: Bilateral Normal disc position (BN, n = 36), Disc Displacement with Reduction (DDR, n = 25), and Disc Displacement without Reduction (DDWR, n = 30). All participants underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and cephalometric analysis of craniofacial structure and three-dimensional assessment of TMJ morphology (including joint spaces, fossa dimensions, and condylar inclination) and oropharyngeal airway volume (OPV) and area (OPA). Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis tests for group comparisons, Spearman's correlation to assess bivariate relationships, and multiple linear regression (MLR) to identify independent predictors of airway dimensions while controlling for confounders. Results: Significant differences were observed in craniofacial, TMJ characteristics, and oropharyngeal airway dimensions among the groups. The DDWR group exhibited a retrognathic and hyperdivergent skeletal pattern (larger ANB, smaller SNB, higher FMA; p < 0.05). The DDR group demonstrated a significantly steeper anterior condylar inclination and a more posteriorly positioned condyle. Crucially, oropharyngeal dimensions were significantly smaller in the DDR group compared to the BN group (OPV: 7688.56 ± 1770.14 mm3 vs. 10,562.47 ± 4185.89 mm3, p = 0.029; OPA: 410.76 ± 77.65 mm2 vs. 513.44 ± 145.21 mm2, p = 0.018). Correlation and MLR analyses revealed that a constricted airway was associated with mandibular retrognathism, specific TMJ features, and reduced vertical facial dimensions. Notably, glenoid fossa height was a significant positive predictor for both OPV and OPA. Conclusions: TMJ DD is associated with specific craniofacial patterns and reduced oropharyngeal airway dimensions. These findings underscore a significant association within the TMJ-craniofacial-airway complex, advocating for an integrated clinical approach in diagnosing and treating temporomandibular disorders and airway compromise.
AB - Background: This study aimed to comprehensively analyse the interrelationships between temporomandibular joint (TMJ) morphology, craniofacial skeletal patterns, and oropharyngeal airway dimensions in patients with TMJ disc displacement (TMJ DD). Methodology: Based on the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and subsequent MRI confirmation, this retrospective study included 91 adult patients with TMD DD. These patients were then categorized into three groups.: Bilateral Normal disc position (BN, n = 36), Disc Displacement with Reduction (DDR, n = 25), and Disc Displacement without Reduction (DDWR, n = 30). All participants underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and cephalometric analysis of craniofacial structure and three-dimensional assessment of TMJ morphology (including joint spaces, fossa dimensions, and condylar inclination) and oropharyngeal airway volume (OPV) and area (OPA). Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis tests for group comparisons, Spearman's correlation to assess bivariate relationships, and multiple linear regression (MLR) to identify independent predictors of airway dimensions while controlling for confounders. Results: Significant differences were observed in craniofacial, TMJ characteristics, and oropharyngeal airway dimensions among the groups. The DDWR group exhibited a retrognathic and hyperdivergent skeletal pattern (larger ANB, smaller SNB, higher FMA; p < 0.05). The DDR group demonstrated a significantly steeper anterior condylar inclination and a more posteriorly positioned condyle. Crucially, oropharyngeal dimensions were significantly smaller in the DDR group compared to the BN group (OPV: 7688.56 ± 1770.14 mm3 vs. 10,562.47 ± 4185.89 mm3, p = 0.029; OPA: 410.76 ± 77.65 mm2 vs. 513.44 ± 145.21 mm2, p = 0.018). Correlation and MLR analyses revealed that a constricted airway was associated with mandibular retrognathism, specific TMJ features, and reduced vertical facial dimensions. Notably, glenoid fossa height was a significant positive predictor for both OPV and OPA. Conclusions: TMJ DD is associated with specific craniofacial patterns and reduced oropharyngeal airway dimensions. These findings underscore a significant association within the TMJ-craniofacial-airway complex, advocating for an integrated clinical approach in diagnosing and treating temporomandibular disorders and airway compromise.
KW - Airway Volume
KW - Cone beam computed tomography
KW - Craniofacial morphology
KW - Disc displacement
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Temporomandibular disorders
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105038131571
U2 - 10.1186/s12903-026-07861-2
DO - 10.1186/s12903-026-07861-2
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:105038131571
SN - 1472-6831
VL - 26
JO - BMC Oral Health
JF - BMC Oral Health
IS - 1
M1 - 812
ER -