TY - JOUR
T1 - The efficacy of intravenous vitamin C in critically ill patients
T2 - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
AU - Xing, Xin
AU - Xu, Min
AU - Yang, Lijun
AU - Zhang, Wenqian
AU - Niu, Xiaolin
AU - Gao, Dengfeng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Background & aims: A large number of clinical studies have shown that intravenous vitamin C supplementation is beneficial for critically ill patients, but current research conclusions are controversial. This meta-analysis included high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous vitamin C in critically ill patients. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to August 15, 2020 to identify published reports of RCTs evaluating the role of intravenous vitamin C in critically ill patients. Risk ratios values (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by random-effects meta-analysis. Trial sequential analysis (TSA), meta-regression, subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results: Our meta-analysis included 18 RCTs involving 2001 patients (1005 with vitamin C treatment and 996 control treatment). Intravenous vitamin C administration reduced the intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) (MD = −0.36, 95% CI: −0.60 to −0.11, P = 0.004) and hospital LOS (MD = −1.50, 95% CI: −2.64 to −0.35, P = 0.01) but had no significant effect on the longest follow-up mortality, hospital or ICU mortality and change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. TSAs for mortality, ICU and hospital LOS were inconclusive. Conclusions: Intravenous vitamin C administration may shorten ICU LOS and hospital LOS. It had no effect on mortality and organ failure. All TSAs were inconclusive, and the value of vitamin C for critically ill patients needs to be demonstrated in more high-quality RCTs.
AB - Background & aims: A large number of clinical studies have shown that intravenous vitamin C supplementation is beneficial for critically ill patients, but current research conclusions are controversial. This meta-analysis included high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous vitamin C in critically ill patients. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to August 15, 2020 to identify published reports of RCTs evaluating the role of intravenous vitamin C in critically ill patients. Risk ratios values (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by random-effects meta-analysis. Trial sequential analysis (TSA), meta-regression, subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results: Our meta-analysis included 18 RCTs involving 2001 patients (1005 with vitamin C treatment and 996 control treatment). Intravenous vitamin C administration reduced the intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) (MD = −0.36, 95% CI: −0.60 to −0.11, P = 0.004) and hospital LOS (MD = −1.50, 95% CI: −2.64 to −0.35, P = 0.01) but had no significant effect on the longest follow-up mortality, hospital or ICU mortality and change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. TSAs for mortality, ICU and hospital LOS were inconclusive. Conclusions: Intravenous vitamin C administration may shorten ICU LOS and hospital LOS. It had no effect on mortality and organ failure. All TSAs were inconclusive, and the value of vitamin C for critically ill patients needs to be demonstrated in more high-quality RCTs.
KW - Critical illness
KW - Intravenous injection
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Vitamin C
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85107152970
U2 - 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.03.007
DO - 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.03.007
M3 - 文章
C2 - 33933729
AN - SCOPUS:85107152970
SN - 0261-5614
VL - 40
SP - 2630
EP - 2639
JO - Clinical Nutrition
JF - Clinical Nutrition
IS - 5
ER -