TY - JOUR
T1 - The different sequences of CDK4/6 inhibitor and mTOR inhibitor in HR+/HER2-advanced breast cancer
T2 - A multicenter real-world study
AU - Liao, Yuqian
AU - Tan, Yujing
AU - Li, Yipeng
AU - Ma, Fei
AU - Wang, Jiayu
AU - Zhang, Pin
AU - Li, Qing
AU - Li, Qiao
AU - Luo, Yang
AU - Lan, Bo
AU - Chen, Shanshan
AU - Xu, Binghe
AU - Jiang, Hanfang
AU - Zhao, Weihong
AU - Fan, Ying
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024/10/15
Y1 - 2024/10/15
N2 - Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) and everolimus (EVE) are effective for patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the efficacy of different sequences of CDK4/6i and EVE are largely unknown. The study aimed to explore the efficacy of different sequences in China. Methods: 146 patients with HR+/HER2- MBC who received both CDK4/6i and EVE in salvage setting were collected. Objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Results: 56 patients received CDK4/6i prior to EVE (Group A), 90 patients received CDK4/6i subsequent to EVE (Group B). The median PFS of CDK4/6i and EVE in Group A vs Group B were 8.4m and 2.5m vs 4.6m and 6.1m respectively. The total PFS of first-line and second-line endocrine therapy were not different between Group A and Group B [13.1m vs 17.7m (P = 0.330, HR = 0.738, 95%CI: 0.399–1.365)]. The 5y OS of patients in Group A or Group B were 62.0 % vs 57.4 %, P = 0.569. Conclusions: We found that no matter CDK4/6i or EVE was used first, the survival were not significantly different between Group A and Group B. Both can be clinical options.
AB - Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) and everolimus (EVE) are effective for patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the efficacy of different sequences of CDK4/6i and EVE are largely unknown. The study aimed to explore the efficacy of different sequences in China. Methods: 146 patients with HR+/HER2- MBC who received both CDK4/6i and EVE in salvage setting were collected. Objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Results: 56 patients received CDK4/6i prior to EVE (Group A), 90 patients received CDK4/6i subsequent to EVE (Group B). The median PFS of CDK4/6i and EVE in Group A vs Group B were 8.4m and 2.5m vs 4.6m and 6.1m respectively. The total PFS of first-line and second-line endocrine therapy were not different between Group A and Group B [13.1m vs 17.7m (P = 0.330, HR = 0.738, 95%CI: 0.399–1.365)]. The 5y OS of patients in Group A or Group B were 62.0 % vs 57.4 %, P = 0.569. Conclusions: We found that no matter CDK4/6i or EVE was used first, the survival were not significantly different between Group A and Group B. Both can be clinical options.
KW - CDK4/6 inhibitor
KW - Everolimus
KW - Survival outcome
KW - Therapeutic sequence
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85204705281
U2 - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38147
DO - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38147
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85204705281
SN - 2405-8440
VL - 10
JO - Heliyon
JF - Heliyon
IS - 19
M1 - e38147
ER -