跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

The comparison of active and passive cancellation coils for SSTF

  • S. Baang
  • , S. Baek
  • , Y. Chu
  • , K. Kim
  • , M. Kim
  • , Y. Kim
  • , Y. Lee
  • , Q. Wang
  • , D. P. Ivanov
  • , V. E. Keilin
  • , S. M. Miklyaev
  • , I. O. Shchegolev
  • , M. I. Surin
  • Samsung
  • Russian Research Centre Kurchatov Institute

科研成果: 期刊稿件 › 会议文章 › 同行评审

1 引用 (Scopus)

摘要

The Samsung superconducting test facility (SSTF) at SAIT (Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology, Taejon, Korea) is to be equipped with a 740 mm inner diameter superconducting split magnet (MC), which provides the background field B0 = 8 T with ramp rate up to 3 T/s at 250 mm gap between the magnet halves. A smaller superconducting split magnet (BC) with the diameter 400 mm will be installed coaxially inside of MC to produce an additional fast variation of magnetic field with ramp rate up to 20 T/s and amplitude ±1 T. In order to reduce the coupling between MC and BC magnets and to avoid the MC disturbance by the fast changing stray field from BC a cancellation coil (CC) is to be provided. The comparison of an active superconducting CC charged in series with BC and a passive cryoresistive, LHe cooled CC (PCC) of which the current is induced during the fast BC discharge only has been made. The advantages of the PCC concept are discussed. The amount of LHe evaporated by PCC (charged for a short time) is estimated to be 3 to 5 liter/pulse. Recovering time for PCC is 5 to 10 min.

源语言英语
页(从-至)508-511
页数4
期刊IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
卷12
期1
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 3月 2002
活动17th Annual Conference on Magnet Technology - Geneva, 瑞士
期限: 24 9月 2001 → 28 9月 2001

学术指纹

探究 'The comparison of active and passive cancellation coils for SSTF' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的学术指纹。

引用此