TY - JOUR
T1 - Stakeholder Theory Is Dead
T2 - Toward an Eco-Centric Ethics
AU - David, Lemuel Kenneth
AU - Wang, Jianling
AU - Cisse, Idrissa I.
AU - Ang’edu Eulalia, N.
AU - Suleman, Dukanwojo Beulah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Stakeholder theory has long functioned as the normative “operating system” of business ethics, civilizing corporate discourse through the language of balancing interests. Yet in the Anthropocene, where planetary boundaries are binding and ecological thresholds are non-negotiable, this orthodoxy collapses. Its axioms of anthropocentrism, commensurability, and managerial arbitration fail in the face of scale effects, tipping points, and non-substitutable ecological functions. This essay advances an alternative: eco-centric ethics. Six axioms reframe responsibility around the intrinsic value of the more-than-human, strong sustainability, ecological limits as deontic constraints, precaution under irreversibility, intergenerational justice, and relational accountability. These principles generate concrete guardrails, negative lists, duties of result, and portfolio exits that subordinate stakeholder dialogue to the integrity of ecological ceilings. The implications are threefold: researchers must move beyond instrumental stakeholder models and retire aggregated ESG scores; managers must embed limits-first governance and ecological veto roles; and policymakers must replace disclosure regimes with binding constraints. The age of balancing our way out of collapse is over; business ethics must recenter life itself as the non-negotiable ground of responsibility.
AB - Stakeholder theory has long functioned as the normative “operating system” of business ethics, civilizing corporate discourse through the language of balancing interests. Yet in the Anthropocene, where planetary boundaries are binding and ecological thresholds are non-negotiable, this orthodoxy collapses. Its axioms of anthropocentrism, commensurability, and managerial arbitration fail in the face of scale effects, tipping points, and non-substitutable ecological functions. This essay advances an alternative: eco-centric ethics. Six axioms reframe responsibility around the intrinsic value of the more-than-human, strong sustainability, ecological limits as deontic constraints, precaution under irreversibility, intergenerational justice, and relational accountability. These principles generate concrete guardrails, negative lists, duties of result, and portfolio exits that subordinate stakeholder dialogue to the integrity of ecological ceilings. The implications are threefold: researchers must move beyond instrumental stakeholder models and retire aggregated ESG scores; managers must embed limits-first governance and ecological veto roles; and policymakers must replace disclosure regimes with binding constraints. The age of balancing our way out of collapse is over; business ethics must recenter life itself as the non-negotiable ground of responsibility.
KW - Anthropocene
KW - business ethics
KW - corporate responsibility
KW - eco-centric ethics
KW - non-substitutability
KW - planetary boundaries
KW - strong sustainability
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105032442617
U2 - 10.1111/beer.70094
DO - 10.1111/beer.70094
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:105032442617
SN - 2694-6416
JO - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility
JF - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility
ER -