TY - JOUR
T1 - Robotic colorectal cancer surgery in China
T2 - a nationwide retrospective observational study
AU - Xu, Jianmin
AU - Tang, Bo
AU - Li, Taiyuan
AU - Jia, Baoqing
AU - Yao, Hongliang
AU - Zhao, Ren
AU - Yuan, Weitang
AU - Zhong, Ming
AU - Chi, Pan
AU - Zhou, Yanbing
AU - Yang, Xiongfei
AU - Cheng, Longwei
AU - He, Yulong
AU - Li, Yongxiang
AU - Tong, Weidong
AU - Sun, Xuejun
AU - Jiang, Zhiwei
AU - Wang, Kang
AU - Li, Xiaorong
AU - Wang, Xin
AU - Wei, Ye
AU - Chen, Zongyou
AU - Zhang, Xiaoqiao
AU - Ye, Yingjiang
AU - Han, Fanghai
AU - Tao, Kaixiong
AU - Kong, Dalu
AU - Wang, Ziqiang
AU - Zhang, Cheng
AU - He, Guodong
AU - Feng, Qingyang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Background: Robotic colorectal cancer surgery is widely accepted and applied. However, there is still no objective and comprehensive assessment on the data of nationwide multicenter series. Method: A total of 28 medical centers in Mainland China participated in this nationwide retrospective observational study. From the first case performed in each center to the last until December 2017, patients with robotic resection for primary tumor and pathologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma were consecutively enrolled. Clinical, pathological and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 5389 eligible patients were finally enrolled in this study, composing 72.2% of the total robotic colorectal surgery volume of Mainland China in the same period. For resections of one bowel segment of primary tumor, the postoperative mortality rate was 0.08% (4/5063 cases), and the postoperative complication rate (Clavien–Dindo grade II or higher) was 8.6% (434/5063 cases). For multiple resections, the postoperative mortality rate was 0.6% (2/326 cases), and the postoperative complication rate was 16.3% (53/326 cases). Out of 2956 patients receiving sphincter-preserving surgery in only primary resection, 130 (4.4%) patients had anastomotic leakage. Traditional low anterior resection (tumor at middle rectum) (OR 2.384, P < 0.001), traditional low anterior resection (tumor at low rectum) (OR 1.968, P = 0.017) and intersphincteric resection (OR 5.468, P = 0.006) were significant independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage. Female gender (OR 0.557, P = 0.005), age ≥ 60 years (OR 0.684, P = 0.040), and preventive stoma (OR 0.496, P = 0.043) were significant independent protective factors. Body mass index, preoperative chemotherapy/radiotherapy, tumor size, and TNM stage did not independently affect the occurrence of anastomotic leakage. Conclusion: Robotic colorectal cancer surgery was safe and reliable and might have advantages in patients at high risk of anastomotic leakage.
AB - Background: Robotic colorectal cancer surgery is widely accepted and applied. However, there is still no objective and comprehensive assessment on the data of nationwide multicenter series. Method: A total of 28 medical centers in Mainland China participated in this nationwide retrospective observational study. From the first case performed in each center to the last until December 2017, patients with robotic resection for primary tumor and pathologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma were consecutively enrolled. Clinical, pathological and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 5389 eligible patients were finally enrolled in this study, composing 72.2% of the total robotic colorectal surgery volume of Mainland China in the same period. For resections of one bowel segment of primary tumor, the postoperative mortality rate was 0.08% (4/5063 cases), and the postoperative complication rate (Clavien–Dindo grade II or higher) was 8.6% (434/5063 cases). For multiple resections, the postoperative mortality rate was 0.6% (2/326 cases), and the postoperative complication rate was 16.3% (53/326 cases). Out of 2956 patients receiving sphincter-preserving surgery in only primary resection, 130 (4.4%) patients had anastomotic leakage. Traditional low anterior resection (tumor at middle rectum) (OR 2.384, P < 0.001), traditional low anterior resection (tumor at low rectum) (OR 1.968, P = 0.017) and intersphincteric resection (OR 5.468, P = 0.006) were significant independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage. Female gender (OR 0.557, P = 0.005), age ≥ 60 years (OR 0.684, P = 0.040), and preventive stoma (OR 0.496, P = 0.043) were significant independent protective factors. Body mass index, preoperative chemotherapy/radiotherapy, tumor size, and TNM stage did not independently affect the occurrence of anastomotic leakage. Conclusion: Robotic colorectal cancer surgery was safe and reliable and might have advantages in patients at high risk of anastomotic leakage.
KW - Anastomotic leakage
KW - Colorectal cancer
KW - Postoperative complications
KW - Robotic surgery
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85096582687
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-020-08157-4
DO - 10.1007/s00464-020-08157-4
M3 - 文章
C2 - 33237468
AN - SCOPUS:85096582687
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 35
SP - 6591
EP - 6603
JO - Surgical Endoscopy
JF - Surgical Endoscopy
IS - 12
ER -