TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of hydrogen production via supercritical water gasification of biomass using interpretable machine learning models
T2 - Considering the element compositions to enhance model generalization and robustness
AU - Hou, Jiale
AU - Tian, Jianghua
AU - Shi, Lingyu
AU - Tan, Jie
AU - Wang, Le
AU - Yi, Lei
AU - Peng, Zhiyong
AU - Xu, Jialing
AU - Jin, Hui
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
PY - 2026/9/30
Y1 - 2026/9/30
N2 - Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) is a highly promising thermochemical route for converting wet biomass into hydrogen-rich synthesis gas, but existing models are biomass-specific and lack interpretability. This paper collects 150 sets of experimental data and constructs five models: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDT), Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Lightweight Gradient Boosting (LGB), with XGB and GBDT showing top accuracy and LGB performing well. SHAP analysis identified temperature and feedstock concentration as key factors, with average contributions of 2.9611 and 3.2772, respectively. LGB demonstrated strong interpretability and pattern-capturing ability. Given LGB overall average metrics (MSE = 0.6379, R2 = 0.9206, MAE = 0.4879) and its excellent interpretability, LGB was selected for multi-biomass analysis. Incorporating biomass elemental composition raised R2 for four gases from 0.4476 to 0.7064 to 0.8832-0.9099, confirming that biomass diversity greatly improves prediction. This study provides a rapid and easily interpretable machine learning tool for optimizing SCWG process parameters and predicting syngas composition.
AB - Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) is a highly promising thermochemical route for converting wet biomass into hydrogen-rich synthesis gas, but existing models are biomass-specific and lack interpretability. This paper collects 150 sets of experimental data and constructs five models: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDT), Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Lightweight Gradient Boosting (LGB), with XGB and GBDT showing top accuracy and LGB performing well. SHAP analysis identified temperature and feedstock concentration as key factors, with average contributions of 2.9611 and 3.2772, respectively. LGB demonstrated strong interpretability and pattern-capturing ability. Given LGB overall average metrics (MSE = 0.6379, R2 = 0.9206, MAE = 0.4879) and its excellent interpretability, LGB was selected for multi-biomass analysis. Incorporating biomass elemental composition raised R2 for four gases from 0.4476 to 0.7064 to 0.8832-0.9099, confirming that biomass diversity greatly improves prediction. This study provides a rapid and easily interpretable machine learning tool for optimizing SCWG process parameters and predicting syngas composition.
KW - Biomass
KW - Hydrogen
KW - Machine learning
KW - Prediction and interpretation
KW - Supercritical water gasification
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105049164385
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.157416
DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.157416
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:105049164385
SN - 0360-3199
VL - 273
JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
M1 - 157416
ER -