跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

Patient-reported outcomes in patients with a germline BRCA mutation and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer receiving olaparib versus chemotherapy in the OlympiAD trial

  • Mark Robson
  • , Kathryn J. Ruddy
  • , Seock Ah IM
  • , Elżbieta Senkus
  • , Binghe Xu
  • , Susan M. Domchek
  • , Norikazu Masuda
  • , Wei Li
  • , Nadine Tung
  • , Anne Armstrong
  • , Suzette Delaloge
  • , Wendy Bannister
  • , Carsten Goessl
  • , Arnold Degboe
  • , Robert Hettle
  • , Pierfranco Conte
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Seoul National University
  • Medical University of Gdańsk
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital
  • Jilin University
  • Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center
  • University of Manchester
  • Institut Gustave Roussy
  • AstraZeneca
  • University of Padua
  • IRCCS Istituto Oncologico Veneto - Padova

科研成果: 期刊稿件文章同行评审

71 引用 (Scopus)

摘要

Background: The phase III OlympiAD study (NCT02000622) showed a statistically significant progression-free survival benefit with olaparib versus chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with a germline BRCA mutation and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. From this study, we report the effect of olaparib on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: Patients were randomised 2:1 to olaparib monotherapy (300 mg twice daily) or single-agent TPC. The primary HRQoL end-point was mean change from baseline in the two-item global health status/QoL score determined from patient-completed European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30-item module (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaires and assessed using a mixed model for repeated measures. Symptoms and functioning domains, best overall response and time to deterioration of QoL were also evaluated. Results: Overall questionnaire compliance rates were 93.2% for olaparib and 76.3% for TPC. Between-treatment global health status/QoL comparison showed a significant improvement in the olaparib arm versus the TPC arm, with mean change of 3.9 (standard deviation 1.2) versus −3.6 (2.2), a difference of 7.5 points (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.48, 12.44; P = 0.0035). A higher proportion of patients in the olaparib arm showed a best overall response of ‘improvement’ in global health status/QoL (33.7% vs 13.4%). Median time to global health status/QoL deterioration was not reached in olaparib patients and was 15.3 months for TPC patients (hazard ratio: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.25, 0.77]; P = 0.004). For EORTC QLQ-C30 symptoms and functioning subscales, only nausea/vomiting symptom score was worse in the olaparib arm than in the TPC arm (across all visits compared with baseline). Conclusion: HRQoL was consistently improved for patients treated with olaparib, compared with chemotherapy TPC.

源语言英语
页(从-至)20-30
页数11
期刊European Journal of Cancer
120
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 10月 2019

联合国可持续发展目标

此成果有助于实现下列可持续发展目标:

  1. 可持续发展目标 3 - 良好健康与福祉
    可持续发展目标 3 良好健康与福祉

学术指纹

探究 'Patient-reported outcomes in patients with a germline BRCA mutation and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer receiving olaparib versus chemotherapy in the OlympiAD trial' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。

引用此