TY - JOUR
T1 - Orelabrutinib versus chemoimmunotherapy in treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma
T2 - a randomized, phase 3 trial
AU - Li, Fei
AU - Zhou, Keshu
AU - Xu, Wei
AU - Cui, Guohui
AU - Yi, Shuhua
AU - Jin, Jie
AU - Zhu, Zunmin
AU - He, Aili
AU - Mi, Jianqing
AU - Xia, Zhongjun
AU - Huang, Xiaobing
AU - Zhou, Xin
AU - Yu, Wenzheng
AU - Guo, Jingming
AU - Zeng, Qingshu
AU - Huang, Shihua
AU - Shuang, Yuerong
AU - Peng, Hongling
AU - Qiu, Lihua
AU - Xu, Bing
AU - Li, Yan
AU - Yang, Yanli
AU - Zhou, Fuling
AU - Wang, Yafei
AU - Liu, Lihong
AU - Ren, Jinhai
AU - Li, Ying
AU - Yang, Wei
AU - Gu, Jian
AU - Ouyang, Guifang
AU - Hua, Luoming
AU - Zhang, Jin
AU - Xiao, Qing
AU - Wang, Shunqing
AU - Zhang, Qingyuan
AU - Liu, Jing
AU - Ding, Kaiyang
AU - Zhang, Liansheng
AU - Zeng, Yun
AU - Li, Zhenyu
AU - Wen, Qin
AU - Gao, Kaibo
AU - Yang, Haiping
AU - Jiang, Yirong
AU - Chen, Yijian
AU - Li, Zengjun
AU - Tang, Xinran
AU - Wang, Weige
AU - Zhao, Renbin
AU - Qiu, Lugui
AU - Li, Jianyong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026.
PY - 2026/12
Y1 - 2026/12
N2 - Orelabrutinib is a potent, irreversible, and highly-selective BTK inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). This randomized, phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04578613) compared orelabrutinib with chemoimmunotherapy in patients with treatment-naïve CLL/SLL. From February 20, 2021, to July 8, 2024, 192 eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either orelabrutinib (91 patients) or chlorambucil plus rituximab (101 patients), comprising the intention-to-treat population. At a median follow-up of 21.4 months (data cutoff, May 17, 2024), the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) per independent review committee (IRC) was not reached (NR; 95% CI, not estimable [NE]–NE) with orelabrutinib versus 19.4 months (95% CI, 16.6–NE) with chlorambucil plus rituximab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18–0.58; p < 0.0001; crossing the efficacy boundary). The IRC-assessed overall response rate (90.1% vs 79.2%; p = 0.041) and duration of response (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.15–0.60; p = 0.0003) also favored orelabrutinib over chlorambucil plus rituximab. In the safety population, treatment-related adverse events occurred in 82 of 91 patients (90.1%) receiving orelabrutinib and 89 of 98 patients (90.8%) receiving chlorambucil plus rituximab, with 32 (35.2%) and 59 (60.2%) at grade 3 or worse, respectively. Orelabrutinib maintained or improved patient-reported outcomes compared with chemoimmunotherapy. In summary, orelabrutinib significantly improved PFS and response versus chemoimmunotherapy in patients with treatment-naïve CLL/SLL, with a manageable safety profile, supporting it as an effective alternative first-line option.
AB - Orelabrutinib is a potent, irreversible, and highly-selective BTK inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). This randomized, phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04578613) compared orelabrutinib with chemoimmunotherapy in patients with treatment-naïve CLL/SLL. From February 20, 2021, to July 8, 2024, 192 eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either orelabrutinib (91 patients) or chlorambucil plus rituximab (101 patients), comprising the intention-to-treat population. At a median follow-up of 21.4 months (data cutoff, May 17, 2024), the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) per independent review committee (IRC) was not reached (NR; 95% CI, not estimable [NE]–NE) with orelabrutinib versus 19.4 months (95% CI, 16.6–NE) with chlorambucil plus rituximab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18–0.58; p < 0.0001; crossing the efficacy boundary). The IRC-assessed overall response rate (90.1% vs 79.2%; p = 0.041) and duration of response (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.15–0.60; p = 0.0003) also favored orelabrutinib over chlorambucil plus rituximab. In the safety population, treatment-related adverse events occurred in 82 of 91 patients (90.1%) receiving orelabrutinib and 89 of 98 patients (90.8%) receiving chlorambucil plus rituximab, with 32 (35.2%) and 59 (60.2%) at grade 3 or worse, respectively. Orelabrutinib maintained or improved patient-reported outcomes compared with chemoimmunotherapy. In summary, orelabrutinib significantly improved PFS and response versus chemoimmunotherapy in patients with treatment-naïve CLL/SLL, with a manageable safety profile, supporting it as an effective alternative first-line option.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105043694918
U2 - 10.1038/s41392-026-02818-x
DO - 10.1038/s41392-026-02818-x
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:105043694918
SN - 2095-9907
VL - 11
JO - Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
JF - Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
IS - 1
M1 - 261
ER -