TY - JOUR
T1 - LSH Models in Federated Recommendation
AU - Dai, Huijun
AU - Zhu, Min
AU - Gui, Xiaolin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the authors.
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Given the challenges in recommendation effectiveness, communication costs, and privacy issues associated with federated learning, the current algorithm amalgamates locality sensitive hash (LSH) with three federated recommendation models: Generalized Matrix Factorization, Multilayer Perceptions, and Neural Matrix Factorization. First, the participation weights of the model are determined based on the participation degree of the federated learning clients to improve the efficiency of joint learning. Second, the local parameters of the federated aggregation model are divided into two groups to protect user embedding. Finally, rapid mapping and similarity retrieval of the upload parameters are performed using LSH to protect user privacy and shorten training time. We conducted experiments to compare the performance differences between LSH-based and Laplace noise-based differential privacy methods in terms of recommendation effectiveness, communication costs, and privacy preservation. Experimental results demonstrate that LSH models achieved a favorable balance between recommendation effectiveness and privacy protection, with improved time performance.
AB - Given the challenges in recommendation effectiveness, communication costs, and privacy issues associated with federated learning, the current algorithm amalgamates locality sensitive hash (LSH) with three federated recommendation models: Generalized Matrix Factorization, Multilayer Perceptions, and Neural Matrix Factorization. First, the participation weights of the model are determined based on the participation degree of the federated learning clients to improve the efficiency of joint learning. Second, the local parameters of the federated aggregation model are divided into two groups to protect user embedding. Finally, rapid mapping and similarity retrieval of the upload parameters are performed using LSH to protect user privacy and shorten training time. We conducted experiments to compare the performance differences between LSH-based and Laplace noise-based differential privacy methods in terms of recommendation effectiveness, communication costs, and privacy preservation. Experimental results demonstrate that LSH models achieved a favorable balance between recommendation effectiveness and privacy protection, with improved time performance.
KW - differential privacy
KW - federated learning
KW - local parameter
KW - locality sensitive hash
KW - model weight
KW - neural collaborative filtering
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85195967322
U2 - 10.3390/app14114423
DO - 10.3390/app14114423
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85195967322
SN - 2076-3417
VL - 14
JO - Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
JF - Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
IS - 11
M1 - 4423
ER -