TY - JOUR
T1 - Interventions to Reduce Racial Bias and Discrimination in the United States
T2 - A Scoping Review
AU - Guo, Shenyang
AU - Yang, Yuanyuan
AU - Fu, Linyun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, University of Chicago Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - Objective: This scoping review examines the methods used in studies of antiracism interventions in the United States during 2014–2021. Method: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we used a systematic search and review process to iden-tify, screen, and summarize research on individual-level interventions intended to reduce racial bias and discrimination. Results: The search recovered 1,928 citations. After screening, 17 articles were retained for a full-text review. Of those, 9 studies used a pre-and post-intervention design without a comparison or control group, 5 used a comparison group, 1 used a randomized control group, and 2 used a single-group posttest-only approach. Except for one study with 8,634 participants, samples ranged from 20 to 721 participants (M 5 112, SD 5 164.8). Eleven studies used reli-able/valid instruments to measure racial bias and discrimination. Thirteen studies explicitly stated theoretical models used in intervention development. Conclusions: Based on features of the 17 interventions, participants and sampling methods, ana-lytical methods, guiding theories, and effectiveness, we recommend (a) use of more rigorous designs to enhance internal validity and (b) use of advanced analytic tech-niques to control selection bias. If implemented, these recommendations would substantially strengthen research on individual-level interventions designed to reduce racial bias and discrimination.
AB - Objective: This scoping review examines the methods used in studies of antiracism interventions in the United States during 2014–2021. Method: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we used a systematic search and review process to iden-tify, screen, and summarize research on individual-level interventions intended to reduce racial bias and discrimination. Results: The search recovered 1,928 citations. After screening, 17 articles were retained for a full-text review. Of those, 9 studies used a pre-and post-intervention design without a comparison or control group, 5 used a comparison group, 1 used a randomized control group, and 2 used a single-group posttest-only approach. Except for one study with 8,634 participants, samples ranged from 20 to 721 participants (M 5 112, SD 5 164.8). Eleven studies used reli-able/valid instruments to measure racial bias and discrimination. Thirteen studies explicitly stated theoretical models used in intervention development. Conclusions: Based on features of the 17 interventions, participants and sampling methods, ana-lytical methods, guiding theories, and effectiveness, we recommend (a) use of more rigorous designs to enhance internal validity and (b) use of advanced analytic tech-niques to control selection bias. If implemented, these recommendations would substantially strengthen research on individual-level interventions designed to reduce racial bias and discrimination.
KW - antiracism intervention
KW - racial bias
KW - racial discrimination
KW - racial stigma
KW - racism
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85158159760
U2 - 10.1086/723871
DO - 10.1086/723871
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85158159760
SN - 2334-2315
VL - 14
SP - 165
EP - 183
JO - Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research
JF - Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research
IS - 1
ER -