跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018

  • Rong Liu
  • , Go Wakabayashi
  • , Hong Jin Kim
  • , Gi Hong Choi
  • , Anusak Yiengpruksawan
  • , Yuman Fong
  • , Jin He
  • , Ugo Boggi
  • , Roberto I. Troisi
  • , Mikhail Efanov
  • , Daniel Azoulay
  • , Daniel Azoulay
  • , Fabrizio Panaro
  • , Patrick Pessaux
  • , Xiao Ying Wang
  • , Jia Fan
  • , Ji Ye Zhu
  • , Shao Geng Zhang
  • , Chuan Dong Sun
  • , Zheng Wu
  • Kai Shan Tao, Ke Hu Yang, Xiao Ping Chen
  • General Hospital of People's Liberation Army
  • Ageo Central General Hospital
  • Yeungnam University
  • Yonsei University
  • Mahidol University
  • City of Hope National Med Center
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
  • University of Naples Federico II
  • Moscow Clinical Scientific Center
  • Hôpital Paul Brousse
  • Tel Hashomer University Hospital
  • CHU Montpellier
  • Hôpital civil
  • Fudan University
  • Peking University
  • PLA No. 302 Hospital
  • Qingdao University
  • Xijing Hospital
  • Lanzhou University
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology

科研成果: 期刊稿件文献综述同行评审

182 引用 (Scopus)

摘要

The robotic surgical system has been applied in liver surgery. However, controversies concerns exist regarding a variety of factors including the safety, feasibility, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery. To promote the development of robotic hepatectomy, this study aimed to evaluate the current status of robotic hepatectomy and provide sixty experts' consensus and recommendations to promote its development. Based on the World Health Organization Handbook for Guideline Development, a Consensus Steering Group and a Consensus Development Group were established to determine the topics, prepare evidence-based documents, and generate recommendations. The GRADE Grid method and Delphi vote were used to formulate the recommendations. A total of 22 topics were prepared analyzed and widely discussed during the 4 meetings. Based on the published articles and expert panel opinion, 7 recommendations were generated by the GRADE method using an evidence-based method, which focused on the safety, feasibility, indication, techniques and cost-effectiveness of hepatectomy. Given that the current evidences were low to very low as evaluated by the GRADE method, further randomized-controlled trials are needed in the future to validate these recommendations.

源语言英语
页(从-至)1432-1444
页数13
期刊World Journal of Gastroenterology
25
12
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 3月 2019

学术指纹

探究 'International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的学术指纹。

引用此