TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of the ecological resettlement program in southern Shaanxi Province, China on households' livelihood strategies
AU - Liu, Wei
AU - Li, Jie
AU - Xu, Jie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Although the social-ecological impacts of resettlement have been widely assessed, the concrete mechanisms by which ecological resettlement influences the livelihoods of resettled households have rarely been examined. Using data collected from a large household survey in southern Shaanxi, China and a propensity score matching method, this study explores the potential impact of resettlement on livelihood strategies. Our results indicate that participation has generally increased the income of relocated households through governmental subsidies and other income, reduced the poverty rate, and improved their living conditions and facilities. Nonetheless, a more nuanced analysis reveals that some of the direct vs. indirect, and short-term vs. long-term effects are not as positive or strong as what would have been hoped for. Multiple policy challenges must be addressed to make the program more effective and sustainable.
AB - Although the social-ecological impacts of resettlement have been widely assessed, the concrete mechanisms by which ecological resettlement influences the livelihoods of resettled households have rarely been examined. Using data collected from a large household survey in southern Shaanxi, China and a propensity score matching method, this study explores the potential impact of resettlement on livelihood strategies. Our results indicate that participation has generally increased the income of relocated households through governmental subsidies and other income, reduced the poverty rate, and improved their living conditions and facilities. Nonetheless, a more nuanced analysis reveals that some of the direct vs. indirect, and short-term vs. long-term effects are not as positive or strong as what would have been hoped for. Multiple policy challenges must be addressed to make the program more effective and sustainable.
KW - Ecological resettlement program
KW - Household survey
KW - Income and assets
KW - Livelihood strategy
KW - Propensity score matching
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85091215219
U2 - 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102310
DO - 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102310
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85091215219
SN - 1389-9341
VL - 120
JO - Forest Policy and Economics
JF - Forest Policy and Economics
M1 - 102310
ER -