How Vital Is the Jurisprudential Relevance: Law Article-Intervened Legal Case Retrieval and Matching

Legal case retrieval aims to automatically scour comparable legal cases based on a given query, which is crucial for offering relevant precedents to support the judgment in intelligent legal systems. Due to similar goals, it is often associated with a similar case matching task. To address them, a daunting challenge is assessing the uniquely defined legal-rational similarity within the judicial domain, which distinctly deviates from the semantic similarities in general text retrieval. Past works either tagged domain-specific factors or incorporated reference laws to capture legal-rational information. However, their heavy reliance on expert or unrealistic assumptions restricts their practical applicability in real-world scenarios. In this article, we propose an end-to-end model named LCM-LAI to solve the above challenges. Through meticulous theoretical analysis, LCM-LAI employs a dependent multi-task learning framework to capture legal-rational information within legal cases by a law article prediction sub-task, without any additional assumptions in inference. In addition, LCM-LAI proposes an article-aware attention mechanism to evaluate the legal-rational similarity between across-case sentences based on the law distribution, which is more effective than semantic similarity. We perform a series of exhaustive experiments that include two different tasks that involving four real-world datasets. The results demonstrate that LCM-LAI achieves state-of-the-art performance.