跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

Efficacy of utidelone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine for heavily pretreated, anthracycline- and taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer: final analysis of overall survival in a phase III randomised controlled trial

  • study group of BG01-1323L
  • China Medical University
  • Harbin Medical University
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center
  • General Hospital of People's Liberation Army
  • Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
  • Henan Cancer Hospital
  • Fudan University
  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
  • Tianjin Medical University
  • Peking University
  • Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute
  • Nankai University
  • Shandong Cancer Hospital
  • The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
  • Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital
  • Sichuan University
  • Wuhan Union Hospital
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Nantong Tumor Hospital
  • Hebei Medical University
  • Fujian Medical University
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  • Beijing Biostar Technologies

科研成果: 期刊稿件文章同行评审

41 引用 (Scopus)

摘要

Background: Primary analysis of the phase III trial BG01-1323L demonstrated that utidelone plus capecitabine significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) versus capecitabine alone in heavily-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Here, we report the final overall survival (OS) analysis and updates of other endpoints. Patients and methods: In total, 405 patients were randomised 2:1 to receive utidelone (30 mg/m2 IV daily, days 1-5, over 90 min) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 orally b.i.d., days 1-14) or capecitabine alone (1250 mg/m2 orally b.i.d., days 1-14) every 21 days. The secondary endpoint, OS, was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier product-limit approach at a two-sided alpha level of 0.05 after the prespecified 310 death events had been reached. Exploratory analyses of the primary endpoint, PFS, and the secondary endpoint, ORR, were also done. Safety was analysed in patients who had at least one dose of study drug. Results: At the final OS analysis, the median duration of follow-up was 19.6 months in the utidelone plus capecitabine group and 15.4 months in the capecitabine alone group. In the intention-to-treat population, 313 deaths had occurred at data cut-off, 203 of 270 patients in the combination group and 110 of 135 in the monotherapy group. Median OS in the combination group was 19.8 months compared with 16.0 months in the monotherapy group [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.75, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.59-0.94, P = 0.0142]. The updated analysis of PFS and ORR showed that the combination therapy remained superior to monotherapy. Safety results were similar to those previously reported with respect to incidence, severity and specificity. No late-emerging toxicities or new safety concerns occurred. Conclusions: For heavily-pretreated, anthracycline- and taxane-resistant MBC patients, utidelone plus capecitabine significantly improved OS versus capecitabine alone. These results support the use of utidelone plus capecitabine as a novel therapeutic regimen for patients with MBC.

源语言英语
页(从-至)218-228
页数11
期刊Annals of Oncology
32
2
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 2月 2021

联合国可持续发展目标

此成果有助于实现下列可持续发展目标:

  1. 可持续发展目标 3 - 良好健康与福祉
    可持续发展目标 3 良好健康与福祉

学术指纹

探究 'Efficacy of utidelone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine for heavily pretreated, anthracycline- and taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer: final analysis of overall survival in a phase III randomised controlled trial' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的学术指纹。

引用此