TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and safety of a second-generation biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent
T2 - One-year results of the CREDIT 2 trial
AU - the CREDIT 2 Investigators
AU - Xu, Kai
AU - Han, Yaling
AU - Xu, Bo
AU - Yang, Yuejin
AU - Wang, Geng
AU - Li, Hui
AU - Sun, Yong
AU - Tao, Ling
AU - Wang, Haichang
AU - Yuan, Zuyi
AU - Liu, Huiliang
AU - Liu, Jinghua
AU - Jia, Yongping
AU - Ma, Genshan
AU - Fu, Guosheng
AU - Li, Xiaodong
AU - Li, Shuren
AU - Wang, Shouli
AU - Pu, Kui
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Aims: We performed a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to determine the noninferiority of a novel biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent (BP-DES), the EXCEL 2 stent, to the first-generation BP-DES, the EXCEL stent. Methods and Results: Patients (n = 419) scheduled to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomized to receive either the EXCEL 2 stent (n = 208) or the EXCEL stent (n = 211) from 15 Chinese centers. At 9 months, primary endpoint in-stent late loss (LL) difference was −0.03 mm (95% confidence interval: −0.09 mm to 0.04 mm) between the EXCEL 2 group (0.14 ± 0.26 mm) and the EXCEL group (0.16 ± 0.36 mm), demonstrating the noninferiority of EXCEL 2 to EXCEL in terms of in-stent LL (P for noninferiority <.0001). Besides, target lesion failure (TLF) was statistically lower in EXCEL 2 group compared with EXCEL through 1 year (HR [95%CI] = 0.45 [0.20,0.98], Plog-rank=.04). Definite/probable ST was observed in 0.0% vs 1.9% (P =.12) of EXCEL 2 vs EXCEL-treated subjects. Conclusions: The second-generation BP-DES (EXCEL 2) was noninferior to the first-generation BP-DES (EXCEL) for the primary endpoint of in-stent LL at 9 months. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02057978.
AB - Aims: We performed a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to determine the noninferiority of a novel biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent (BP-DES), the EXCEL 2 stent, to the first-generation BP-DES, the EXCEL stent. Methods and Results: Patients (n = 419) scheduled to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomized to receive either the EXCEL 2 stent (n = 208) or the EXCEL stent (n = 211) from 15 Chinese centers. At 9 months, primary endpoint in-stent late loss (LL) difference was −0.03 mm (95% confidence interval: −0.09 mm to 0.04 mm) between the EXCEL 2 group (0.14 ± 0.26 mm) and the EXCEL group (0.16 ± 0.36 mm), demonstrating the noninferiority of EXCEL 2 to EXCEL in terms of in-stent LL (P for noninferiority <.0001). Besides, target lesion failure (TLF) was statistically lower in EXCEL 2 group compared with EXCEL through 1 year (HR [95%CI] = 0.45 [0.20,0.98], Plog-rank=.04). Definite/probable ST was observed in 0.0% vs 1.9% (P =.12) of EXCEL 2 vs EXCEL-treated subjects. Conclusions: The second-generation BP-DES (EXCEL 2) was noninferior to the first-generation BP-DES (EXCEL) for the primary endpoint of in-stent LL at 9 months. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02057978.
KW - biodegradable-polymer
KW - drug-eluting stent
KW - interventional cardiology
KW - randomized trial
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85044266398
U2 - 10.1111/1755-5922.12327
DO - 10.1111/1755-5922.12327
M3 - 文章
C2 - 29493880
AN - SCOPUS:85044266398
SN - 1755-5914
VL - 36
JO - Cardiovascular Therapeutics
JF - Cardiovascular Therapeutics
IS - 3
M1 - e12327
ER -