TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of silicon–aluminum additives on ash fusion and ash mineral conversion of Xinjiang high-sodium coal
AU - Wei, Bo
AU - Wang, Xuebin
AU - Tan, Houzhang
AU - Zhang, Limeng
AU - Wang, Yibin
AU - Wang, Zhao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The high sodium content in Xinjiang coal ash induces severe fouling and slagging in pulverized coal furnaces. To solve these problems, many people have reported to use silicon–aluminum additives. In this paper, the effects of silicon–aluminum additives (SiO2, kaolin, and fly ash) on ash fusion characteristic, mineral transformation, and sodium emission were investigated. The results showed that the ash fusion temperatures (AFTs) manifested a pattern of decrease first and increase later along with an increasing in silicon–aluminum additive ratios. To achieve higher AFTs than that of raw coal ash, the blending proportion of silicon–aluminum additives is recommended as high as 9%. The causes for these results were explored. When the proportion of the additives was 3%, Ertixiite (Na2Si2O5), nepheline (NaAlSi3O8), lazurite (Na7Al6Si6O24S3) and hauyne (Na6Ca2Al6Si6O24(SO4)2), were formed at 1150 °C. These species with low melting temperatures are flux minerals and lower ash fusion temperature, resulting in the lowest AFTs. This is the main cause of lower ash fusion point in the case of lower blending ratios. Moreover, almost all of the tested additives show the capability of capturing sodium, in which, the capturing capability of SiO2is the best. For sodium capture capacity of the three additives under most tested conditions, the optimum temperature was around 1000 °C.
AB - The high sodium content in Xinjiang coal ash induces severe fouling and slagging in pulverized coal furnaces. To solve these problems, many people have reported to use silicon–aluminum additives. In this paper, the effects of silicon–aluminum additives (SiO2, kaolin, and fly ash) on ash fusion characteristic, mineral transformation, and sodium emission were investigated. The results showed that the ash fusion temperatures (AFTs) manifested a pattern of decrease first and increase later along with an increasing in silicon–aluminum additive ratios. To achieve higher AFTs than that of raw coal ash, the blending proportion of silicon–aluminum additives is recommended as high as 9%. The causes for these results were explored. When the proportion of the additives was 3%, Ertixiite (Na2Si2O5), nepheline (NaAlSi3O8), lazurite (Na7Al6Si6O24S3) and hauyne (Na6Ca2Al6Si6O24(SO4)2), were formed at 1150 °C. These species with low melting temperatures are flux minerals and lower ash fusion temperature, resulting in the lowest AFTs. This is the main cause of lower ash fusion point in the case of lower blending ratios. Moreover, almost all of the tested additives show the capability of capturing sodium, in which, the capturing capability of SiO2is the best. For sodium capture capacity of the three additives under most tested conditions, the optimum temperature was around 1000 °C.
KW - Additives
KW - Ash fusion
KW - High sodium coal
KW - Mineral transformation
KW - Sodium fixation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84961195594
U2 - 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.02.072
DO - 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.02.072
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:84961195594
SN - 0016-2361
VL - 181
SP - 1224
EP - 1229
JO - Fuel
JF - Fuel
ER -