TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of pretreatment with calcium-containing desensitizer on the dentine bonding of mild self-etch adhesives
AU - Pei, Dandan
AU - Liu, Siying
AU - Huang, Cui
AU - Du, Xijin
AU - Yang, Hongye
AU - Wang, Yake
AU - Deng, Donglai
PY - 2013/6
Y1 - 2013/6
N2 - Desensitizing agents are frequently applied to sensitive teeth and may affect subsequent resin bonding. The current study aimed to evaluate the bonding performance of two self-etch adhesives containing functional monomers to dentine pretreated with three new calcium-containing desensitizers. No desensitizer was applied in the control group. Groups 1, 2, and 3 were treated with an arginine-calcium carbonate-containing polishing paste, a casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP)-containing paste, and an experimental hydroxyapatite paste, respectively. G-Bond and Clearfil S3 Bond were used for bonding after desensitizer treatments. The microtensile bond strength (μTBS) was tested (n = 20 beams per group) and failure mode distribution was analyzed. Scanning electron microscopy was used to observe the occlusion of dentinal tubules. The mean (±SD) μTBS values, expressed in MPa, of groups 1, 2, and 3 and the control group were, respectively, 30.81 (7.79), 44.41 (8.02), 31.49 (6.13), and 41.40 (8.67) for G-Bond and 39.63 (9.59), 32.55 (7.86), 37.50 (8.60), 27.90 (6.52) for S3 Bond. Most failures were recorded as adhesive failure (69.375%), instead of cohesive failure or mixed failure. The dentinal tubules were seldom plugged in group 2, but were mostly occluded in groups 1 and 3. Two-way anova indicated that desensitizer application in association with a compatible adhesive system should be used when endeavoring to control hypersensitivity without adverse interference in bonding.
AB - Desensitizing agents are frequently applied to sensitive teeth and may affect subsequent resin bonding. The current study aimed to evaluate the bonding performance of two self-etch adhesives containing functional monomers to dentine pretreated with three new calcium-containing desensitizers. No desensitizer was applied in the control group. Groups 1, 2, and 3 were treated with an arginine-calcium carbonate-containing polishing paste, a casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP)-containing paste, and an experimental hydroxyapatite paste, respectively. G-Bond and Clearfil S3 Bond were used for bonding after desensitizer treatments. The microtensile bond strength (μTBS) was tested (n = 20 beams per group) and failure mode distribution was analyzed. Scanning electron microscopy was used to observe the occlusion of dentinal tubules. The mean (±SD) μTBS values, expressed in MPa, of groups 1, 2, and 3 and the control group were, respectively, 30.81 (7.79), 44.41 (8.02), 31.49 (6.13), and 41.40 (8.67) for G-Bond and 39.63 (9.59), 32.55 (7.86), 37.50 (8.60), 27.90 (6.52) for S3 Bond. Most failures were recorded as adhesive failure (69.375%), instead of cohesive failure or mixed failure. The dentinal tubules were seldom plugged in group 2, but were mostly occluded in groups 1 and 3. Two-way anova indicated that desensitizer application in association with a compatible adhesive system should be used when endeavoring to control hypersensitivity without adverse interference in bonding.
KW - Dentine bonding
KW - Desensitizer
KW - Microtensile bond strength
KW - Self-etch adhesive
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84877661632
U2 - 10.1111/eos.12047
DO - 10.1111/eos.12047
M3 - 文章
C2 - 23659244
AN - SCOPUS:84877661632
SN - 0909-8836
VL - 121
SP - 204
EP - 210
JO - European Journal of Oral Sciences
JF - European Journal of Oral Sciences
IS - 3 PART1
ER -