Corrigendum to ‘Effectiveness of nurse-led electronic health interventions on illness management in patients with chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis’ [Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 150 (2024) 104630] (International Journal of Nursing Studies (2024) 150, (S0020748923001955), (10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104630))

We regret errors in Section 5.2.1. Quality of life of this paper and thank the reader who brought them to our attention. Nineteen studies assessed quality of life (QoL), utilizing various instruments. Specifically, ten studies employed the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), three studies utilized the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-form Health Survey (SF-36), three studies used the EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D), and one study also used MLHFQ. Additionally, three studies measured QoL using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Electronic health interventions led to a remarkable decrease in QoL score measured by the MLHFQ (MD: − 5.79, 95 % CI: − 9.19 to − 2.39., p < 0.05. I² = 90 %, Fig. 6). It should be noted that the MLHFQ is designed such that higher scores indicate a more adverse impact on QoL. Furthermore, nurse-led electronic health interventions yielded a significant improvement in QoL when assessed with the SF-36 (MD: 6.04, 95 % CI: 4.45 to 7.64, p < 0.05, I² = 73 %, Fig. 7);. Figs. 6 and 7 have been corrected — as follows.[Formula presented][Formula presented] The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.