跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

Clinical efficacy of fulvestrant versus exemestane as first-line therapies for Chinese postmenopausal oestrogen-receptor positive /human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 -advanced breast cancer (FRIEND study)

  • Jiayu Wang
  • , Li Cai
  • , Yanqiu Song
  • , Tao Sun
  • , Zhongsheng Tong
  • , Yuee Teng
  • , Huiping Li
  • , Quchang Ouyang
  • , Qianjun Chen
  • , Shude Cui
  • , Yongmei Yin
  • , Ning Liao
  • , Qiang Sun
  • , Jifeng Feng
  • , Xiaojia Wang
  • , Binghe Xu
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Harbin Medical University
  • Jilin University
  • Liaoning Tumor Hospital & Institute
  • Tianjin Medical University
  • China Medical University
  • Peking University
  • Central South University
  • Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
  • Henan Cancer Hospital
  • The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
  • Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Institute & Hospital
  • Zhejiang Cancer Hospital

科研成果: 期刊稿件文章同行评审

11 引用 (Scopus)

摘要

Aim: To compare the efficacies of exemestane and fulvestrant as first-line monotherapies for postmenopausal Chinese women having advanced oestrogen-receptor positive (ER+)/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-breast cancer (ER+/HER2- ABC) after a previous treatment for ≥2 years with an adjuvant non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor. Methods: In this randomised, open-label, multi-centre, parallel-controlled phase 2 FRIEND study, 145 postmenopausal ER+/HER2- ABC patients were assigned into fulvestrant (500 mg on days 0, 14 and 28, and then at every 28 ± 3 days, n = 77) and exemestane (25 mg/day, n = 67) groups. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary outcomes were disease control rate, objective response rate, time to treatment failure, duration of response and overall survival. Exploratory end-points included gene mutation-related outcomes and safety. Results: Fulvestrant was superior to exemestane regarding median PFS times (8.5 versus 5.6 months, p = 0.014, HR = 0.62, 95% confidence intervals: 0.42–0.91), objective response rates (19.5% versus 6.0%, p = 0.017) and time to treatment failure (8.4 versus 5.5 months, p = 0.008). The incidence of adverse or serious adverse events in the two groups was virtually identical. The most frequent mutations in 129 analysed patients were detected in the oestrogen receptor gene 1 (ESR1) (18/14.0%), PIK3CA (40/31.0%) and TP53 (29/22.5%) genes. Fulvestrant produced significant longer PFS times compared to exemestane but only for patients with an ESR1-wild type (8.5 versus 5.8 months) (p = 0.035), although there was a similar trend also for the ESR1 mutation without statistical significance. All patients with c-MYC and BRCA2 mutations had longer PFS times in the fulvestrant versus the exemestane group (p = 0.049, p = 0.039). Conclusion: Fulvestrant significantly increased overall PFS for ER+/HER2- ABC patients and was well tolerated. ClinicalTrials: NCT02646735, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02646735.

源语言英语
页(从-至)73-82
页数10
期刊European Journal of Cancer
184
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 5月 2023

联合国可持续发展目标

此成果有助于实现下列可持续发展目标:

  1. 可持续发展目标 3 - 良好健康与福祉
    可持续发展目标 3 良好健康与福祉

学术指纹

探究 'Clinical efficacy of fulvestrant versus exemestane as first-line therapies for Chinese postmenopausal oestrogen-receptor positive /human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 -advanced breast cancer (FRIEND study)' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。

引用此