TY - JOUR
T1 - Cell-level comparative ARC study on thermal runaway and gas hazards of LFP and polyanionic Na-ion batteries for residential energy storage
AU - He, Yueyang
AU - Chen, Linyu
AU - Liu, Yanan
AU - Liu, Yinhe
AU - Zhang, Shiqian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2026/8
Y1 - 2026/8
N2 - To support cell-level safety assessment for residential energy storage systems, this study compares commercial lithium iron phosphate (LFP) and polyanionic sodium-ion (SIB) batteries under identical accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC) conditions. The surface temperature, voltage, and internal pressure of the batteries were measured to characterize thermal runaway (TR) evolution, while post-test gas chromatography (GC) was used to analyze the final mixed gas composition after thermal runaway. The results indicate that both batteries follow a four-stage TR evolution process, including thermal latency, thermal incubation, thermal eruption, and cooling decay. However, their safety characteristics differ substantially. The LFP battery shows stronger resistance to thermal initiation, with a self-heating onset temperature of 131.48 °C and a thermal runaway warning time of 262.07 min. In comparison, the SIB battery exhibits a milder eruption stage, with a peak temperature of 296.36 °C and a mass-specific heat release of 142.5 kJ/kg, both lower than those of the LFP battery. The SIB battery also shows a more uniform spatial temperature distribution and weaker localized hot-spot formation. Post-test gas analysis shows that the final mixed gas from the SIB battery is dominated by CO2 (68.12%), with flammable components accounting for 26.18%. However, the SIB battery also produces a higher absolute CO yield than the LFP battery, indicating that CO-related exposure risk requires dedicated attention. This work provides a cell-level comparative dataset for commercial LFP and polyanionic Na-ion batteries under identical ARC conditions, clarifying their trade-offs among thermal stability, eruption intensity, gas yield, flammability, and CO-related toxicity risk.
AB - To support cell-level safety assessment for residential energy storage systems, this study compares commercial lithium iron phosphate (LFP) and polyanionic sodium-ion (SIB) batteries under identical accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC) conditions. The surface temperature, voltage, and internal pressure of the batteries were measured to characterize thermal runaway (TR) evolution, while post-test gas chromatography (GC) was used to analyze the final mixed gas composition after thermal runaway. The results indicate that both batteries follow a four-stage TR evolution process, including thermal latency, thermal incubation, thermal eruption, and cooling decay. However, their safety characteristics differ substantially. The LFP battery shows stronger resistance to thermal initiation, with a self-heating onset temperature of 131.48 °C and a thermal runaway warning time of 262.07 min. In comparison, the SIB battery exhibits a milder eruption stage, with a peak temperature of 296.36 °C and a mass-specific heat release of 142.5 kJ/kg, both lower than those of the LFP battery. The SIB battery also shows a more uniform spatial temperature distribution and weaker localized hot-spot formation. Post-test gas analysis shows that the final mixed gas from the SIB battery is dominated by CO2 (68.12%), with flammable components accounting for 26.18%. However, the SIB battery also produces a higher absolute CO yield than the LFP battery, indicating that CO-related exposure risk requires dedicated attention. This work provides a cell-level comparative dataset for commercial LFP and polyanionic Na-ion batteries under identical ARC conditions, clarifying their trade-offs among thermal stability, eruption intensity, gas yield, flammability, and CO-related toxicity risk.
KW - Gas generation profile
KW - Lithium iron phosphate battery
KW - Polyanionic sodium-ion battery
KW - Residential energy storage safety
KW - Thermal runaway behavior
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105043353142
U2 - 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.132186
DO - 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.132186
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:105043353142
SN - 1359-4311
VL - 303
JO - Applied Thermal Engineering
JF - Applied Thermal Engineering
M1 - 132186
ER -