跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

Blessing or curse? Market-driven environmental regulation and enterprises' total factor productivity: Evidence from China's carbon market pilots

  • Caiquan Bai
  • , Hangjuan Liu
  • , Rongjie Zhang
  • , Chen Feng
  • Shandong University

科研成果: 期刊稿件 › 文章 › 同行评审

120 引用 (Scopus)

摘要

This study explores the question of whether building a unified carbon market is a blessing or a curse for enterprises in China under the background of global carbon emission reduction goals. Using data on China's A-share listed enterprises and city panel data from 2008 to 2019, we evaluate the effect of China's carbon market pilots, a market-driven environmental regulation policy, on enterprises' total factor productivity (TFP). The findings indicate that the pilot policy promoted enterprises' TFP in the pilot areas by approximately 0.05 on average during the sample period. In particular, the TFP of enterprises in high‑carbon emission industries increased by an average of 0.11. This positive effect is confirmed in the robustness tests. Meanwhile, the effect also is heterogeneous for different regions and enterprises. It depends on enterprise scale, property rights, governance level, financing constraints and registration address. Additionally, the promotion effect works through three channels, including government environmental protection efforts, enterprise resource allocation optimization, and increased investment in R&D. Therefore, building a carbon market is proven to be positive for the development of enterprises. This study enriches the research on pollution control and economic growth and provides policy references for achieving carbon reduction goals.

源语言英语
期刊论文编号106432
期刊Energy Economics
卷117
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 1月 2023

联合国可持续发展目标

此成果有助于实现下列可持续发展目标:

  1. 可持续发展目标 8 - 体面工作和经济增长
    可持续发展目标 8 体面工作和经济增长
  2. 可持续发展目标 11 - 可持续城市和社区
    可持续发展目标 11 可持续城市和社区

学术指纹

探究 'Blessing or curse? Market-driven environmental regulation and enterprises' total factor productivity: Evidence from China's carbon market pilots' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的学术指纹。

引用此