跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

Biomechanical comparison of different techniques in primary spinal surgery in osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae: Expansive pedicle screw versus polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw

  • Da Liu
  • , Zi Xiang Wu
  • , Xian Ming Pan
  • , Suo Chao Fu
  • , Ming Xuan Gao
  • , Lei Shi
  • , Wei Lei

科研成果: 期刊稿件文章同行评审

58 引用 (Scopus)

摘要

Introduction: Transpedicular fixation can be challenging in the osteoporotic spine. Expansive pedicle screw (EPS) and polymethylmethacrylate- augmented pedicle screw (PMMA-PS) were both used to increase screw stability. However, there are a little or no biomechanical comparisons of EPS and PMMA-PS, especially in primary spinal surgery in osteoporotic vertebrae. The purpose of this study was to compare the stability of EPS and PMMA-PS in primary spinal surgery. Materials and methods: Fifteen osteoporotic vertebrae were randomly divided into three groups. The conventional pedicle screw (CPS) was inserted in CPS group, the pilot hole was filled with PMMA followed by CPS insertion in PMMA-PS group, and EPS was inserted in EPS group. Twenty-four hours later, X-ray and CT examination and biomechanical tests were performed to all vertebrae. Results: In PMMA-PS group, PMMA existed in bone tissue around the CPS in both vertebral body and pedicle of vertebral arch, and PMMA surrounding the screw formed a spindle-shaped structure in vertebral body. In EPS group, anterior part of EPS presented an obvious expansion in vertebral body and formed a clawlike structure. Screw stabilities in PMMA-PS and EPS groups were significantly enhanced compared with those in CPS group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between PMMA-PS and EPS groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Expansive pedicle screw can markedly enhance screw stability with a similar effect to the traditional method of screw augmentation with PMMA in primary surgery in osteoporotic vertebrae. In addition, EPS can overcome pedicle fracture, leakage and compression caused by lager screw and augmentation with PMMA. We propose that EPS is an effective, safe and easy method and has a great application potential in augmentation of screw stability in osteoporosis in clinic.

源语言英语
页(从-至)1227-1232
页数6
期刊Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
131
9
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 9月 2011
已对外发布

学术指纹

探究 'Biomechanical comparison of different techniques in primary spinal surgery in osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae: Expansive pedicle screw versus polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。

引用此