TY - JOUR
T1 - Anatomic ankle implant can provide better tibiotalar joint kinematics and loading
AU - Zhang, Yanwei
AU - Chen, Zhenxian
AU - Zhao, Dahang
AU - Yu, Jian
AU - Ma, Xin
AU - Jin, Zhongmin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 IPEM
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Restoration of ankle kinematic functions is the major objective following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). However, the clinical results of traditional ankle implants are still unsatisfactory. Anatomic ankle implant may provide better ankle kinematic functions and load distribution. In this study, the biomechanical performances between two potential anatomic ankle implants and a commercial INBONE II implant were compared using a previously developed patient-specific musculoskeletal multibody dynamics model during walking. Furthermore, the effects of the different height differences between the medial and lateral borders on the ankle biomechanics and kinematics were also investigated. Significant improvements in kinematic functions especially in internal-external rotation and inversion-eversion, and in load balance between the medial and lateral contacts of the two anatomic ankle implants were observed, as compared to the INBONE II ankle implant. The design of anatomic ankle implant with the medial peak higher than the lateral peak had better performance in restoring the internal-external rotation and balancing the medial and lateral contact forces. The kinematics and loads were not sensitive to the height difference for the anatomic ankle implant with medial border higher than lateral border. The anatomic articular surface design of artificial ankle implant can provide better tibiotalar joint kinematics and loading, therefore, anatomic ankle implant should be considered in the future implant design and surgical procedures.
AB - Restoration of ankle kinematic functions is the major objective following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). However, the clinical results of traditional ankle implants are still unsatisfactory. Anatomic ankle implant may provide better ankle kinematic functions and load distribution. In this study, the biomechanical performances between two potential anatomic ankle implants and a commercial INBONE II implant were compared using a previously developed patient-specific musculoskeletal multibody dynamics model during walking. Furthermore, the effects of the different height differences between the medial and lateral borders on the ankle biomechanics and kinematics were also investigated. Significant improvements in kinematic functions especially in internal-external rotation and inversion-eversion, and in load balance between the medial and lateral contacts of the two anatomic ankle implants were observed, as compared to the INBONE II ankle implant. The design of anatomic ankle implant with the medial peak higher than the lateral peak had better performance in restoring the internal-external rotation and balancing the medial and lateral contact forces. The kinematics and loads were not sensitive to the height difference for the anatomic ankle implant with medial border higher than lateral border. The anatomic articular surface design of artificial ankle implant can provide better tibiotalar joint kinematics and loading, therefore, anatomic ankle implant should be considered in the future implant design and surgical procedures.
KW - Anatomic ankle implant
KW - Biomechanics
KW - Kinematics
KW - Musculoskeletal multibody dynamics simulation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85126629167
U2 - 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103789
DO - 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103789
M3 - 文章
C2 - 35500990
AN - SCOPUS:85126629167
SN - 1350-4533
VL - 103
JO - Medical Engineering and Physics
JF - Medical Engineering and Physics
M1 - 103789
ER -