TY - JOUR
T1 - An experimental comparison of heat transfer characteristic between R134-a and R22 in spray cooling
AU - Chen, Shuangtao
AU - Liu, Jionghui
AU - Liu, Xiufang
AU - Hou, Yu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2015/9/1
Y1 - 2015/9/1
N2 - Spray cooling is one of the promising technologies in heat removing for high power density equipment, especially for the equipment with high heat flux surface. R134-a is one of the most prospective alternative refrigerants of R22 due to the zero ODP, low GWP, non-toxicity and non-inflammability, it is necessary to do comparative study on the heat transfer characteristics of R22 and R134-a in spray cooling. In this article, two closed loop spray cooling test rigs with the same spray nozzle are established to investigate the thermal performance of R22 spray cooling and R134-a spray cooling. The main parameters such as critical heat flux (CHF), heat transfer coefficient and target surface temperature are compared in the same thermal condition. The CHF of R134-a spray is lower due to the lower latent heat. The heat transfer coefficient of R22 spray is higher than that of R134-a spray with the same spray chamber pressure. However, R134-a spray cooling could replace R22 spray cooling in the phase change heat transfer region when the heat flux is less than 80Wcm-2.
AB - Spray cooling is one of the promising technologies in heat removing for high power density equipment, especially for the equipment with high heat flux surface. R134-a is one of the most prospective alternative refrigerants of R22 due to the zero ODP, low GWP, non-toxicity and non-inflammability, it is necessary to do comparative study on the heat transfer characteristics of R22 and R134-a in spray cooling. In this article, two closed loop spray cooling test rigs with the same spray nozzle are established to investigate the thermal performance of R22 spray cooling and R134-a spray cooling. The main parameters such as critical heat flux (CHF), heat transfer coefficient and target surface temperature are compared in the same thermal condition. The CHF of R134-a spray is lower due to the lower latent heat. The heat transfer coefficient of R22 spray is higher than that of R134-a spray with the same spray chamber pressure. However, R134-a spray cooling could replace R22 spray cooling in the phase change heat transfer region when the heat flux is less than 80Wcm-2.
KW - Heat transfer characteristics
KW - R134-a
KW - R22
KW - Refrigerants spray cooling
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84928105686
U2 - 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.03.015
DO - 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.03.015
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:84928105686
SN - 0894-1777
VL - 66
SP - 206
EP - 212
JO - Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
JF - Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
ER -