TY - JOUR
T1 - Accuracy comparisons of channel emulation methods for two-dimensional uniform and three-dimensional sectored multi-probe anechoic chamber
AU - Huang, Xiaoyu
AU - Chen, Xiaoming
AU - Pei, Huiling
AU - Li, Yingsong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© ACES.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) over-the-air (OTA) testing has been seen as a promising solution for evaluation of the radio performance of MIMO devices. In this work, we compare the accuracy of two channel emulation methods, i.e., the prefaded signal synthesis (PFS) and the plane wave synthesis (PWS), in two-dimensional (2D) uniform and 3D sectored multi-probe anechoic chamber (MPAC), respectively. The PWS method is proven to be more accurate than the PFS for 2D uniform MPAC system. However, for 3D sectored MPAC system, the PFS method emerged to be better than the PWS method. To explain these seemingly contradicting findings, both the required number of active probes and the leakage of power spectrum are considered in this paper. It is found that the PWS method has higher emulation accuracy than the PFS method when the number of active probes becomes sufficiently large, whereas the PFS is more robust to the undersampling due to the limited number of active probes in practical 3D sectored MPAC system. Moreover, when the number of active probes is particularly small (less than the number of clusters in the probe panel), the emulation accuracy of the PWS method outperform its counterpart.
AB - Multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) over-the-air (OTA) testing has been seen as a promising solution for evaluation of the radio performance of MIMO devices. In this work, we compare the accuracy of two channel emulation methods, i.e., the prefaded signal synthesis (PFS) and the plane wave synthesis (PWS), in two-dimensional (2D) uniform and 3D sectored multi-probe anechoic chamber (MPAC), respectively. The PWS method is proven to be more accurate than the PFS for 2D uniform MPAC system. However, for 3D sectored MPAC system, the PFS method emerged to be better than the PWS method. To explain these seemingly contradicting findings, both the required number of active probes and the leakage of power spectrum are considered in this paper. It is found that the PWS method has higher emulation accuracy than the PFS method when the number of active probes becomes sufficiently large, whereas the PFS is more robust to the undersampling due to the limited number of active probes in practical 3D sectored MPAC system. Moreover, when the number of active probes is particularly small (less than the number of clusters in the probe panel), the emulation accuracy of the PWS method outperform its counterpart.
KW - Multi-probe anechoic chamber (MPAC)
KW - Over-the-air (OTA)
KW - Plane wave synthesis (PWS)
KW - Pre-faded signal synthesis (PFS)
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85119717528
U2 - 10.47037/2021.ACES.J.36093
DO - 10.47037/2021.ACES.J.36093
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85119717528
SN - 1054-4887
VL - 36
SP - 1139
EP - 1144
JO - Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal
JF - Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal
IS - 9
ER -