跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

A preliminary randomized controlled trial of different treatment regimens for melancholic depression

  • Yun Wang
  • , Xiaohua Liu
  • , Daihui Peng
  • , Yan Wu
  • , Yun’Ai Su
  • , Jia Xu
  • , Xiancang Ma
  • , Yi Li
  • , Jianfei Shi
  • , Xiaojing Cheng
  • , Han Rong
  • , Yiru Fang
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Peking University
  • Harbin First Specific Hospital
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University
  • Wuhan Mental Health Center
  • Hangzhou Seventh People’s Hospital
  • Shandong Mental Health Center
  • Shenzhen University
  • CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology

科研成果: 期刊稿件文章同行评审

1 引用 (Scopus)

摘要

Background: Fluoxetine, bupropion, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and physical therapies (modified electroconvulsive treatment or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimula-tion) can be used to manage melancholic depression. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of various treatments in patients with melancholic depression. Methods: This was a preliminary multicenter randomized controlled trial that included patients with depression in their first or recurrent acute episode between September 2016 and June 2019, and randomized to fluoxetine, fluoxetine+CBT, fluoxetine+bupropion, and fluoxetine+bupropion+brain stimulation. The primary endpoint was the decrease in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-HDRS). The secondary endpoint included the scores from the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR), QOL-6, and safety. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. The follow-ups were performed at the end of the 0th, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, and 12th weeks of treatment. Results: Finally, 113 patients were included in the analyses: fluoxetine (n=37), fluoxetine +CBT (n=27), fluoxetine+bupropion (n=34), and fluoxetine+bupropion+brain stimulation (n=15). The 17-HDRS and QIDS-SR scores decreased in all four groups (all P<0.05). There were no differences in the 17-HDRS scores among the four groups at the end of treatment (P=0.779), except for fluoxetine alone showing a better response regarding self-consciousness than fluoxetine+bupropion. The QOL-6 scores increased in all four groups. The occurrence of AEs among the four groups showed no significant difference (P=0.053). Conclusion: This preliminary trial suggests that all four interventions (fluoxetine, fluoxetine +CBT, fluoxetine+bupropion, and fluoxetine+bupropion+brain stimulation) achieved similar response and remission rates in patients with melancholic depression, but that fluoxetine had a better effect on self-consciousness than fluoxetine+bupropion. The safety profile was manageable.

源语言英语
页(从-至)2441-2449
页数9
期刊Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
17
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 2021
已对外发布

联合国可持续发展目标

此成果有助于实现下列可持续发展目标:

  1. 可持续发展目标 3 - 良好健康与福祉
    可持续发展目标 3 良好健康与福祉

学术指纹

探究 'A preliminary randomized controlled trial of different treatment regimens for melancholic depression' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。

引用此