TY - JOUR
T1 - A coordinate positioning puncture method under robot-assisted CT-guidance
T2 - phantom and animal experiments
AU - Zhang, Weifan
AU - Xia, Peng
AU - Liu, Shijie
AU - Huang, Xiaowei
AU - Zhao, Xinhui
AU - Liu, Zhao
AU - Dang, Hui
AU - Li, Xiaohu
AU - Niu, Gang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 Society of Medical Innovation and Technology.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of the robot-assisted computed tomography (CT)-guided coordinate positioning puncture method by phantom and animal experiments. Material and methods: In the phantom experiment, seven robot-assisted punctures were made to evaluate the accuracy of the method. In the animal experiment, 18 punctures (nine robotic and nine manual) were made in the livers of nine rabbits. The indicators, such as needle-tract length, angle deviation, puncture accuracy, number of scans required, and radiation exposure dose were compared between manual and robotic punctures. The paired-samples t-test was used for analysis. Results: In the phantom experiment, the mean accuracy of seven punctures was 2.67 mm. In the animal experiment, there was no significant difference in needle-tract length (32.58 mm vs. 34.04 mm, p =.606), angle deviation (17.21° vs. 21.23° p =.557) and puncture accuracy (8.42 vs. 8.77 mm, p =.851) between the two groups. However, the number CT scans required (2.44 vs. 3.33, p =.002), and the radiation exposure dose (772.98 vs. 1077.89 mGy/cm, p =.003) were lower in the robot group than in the manual group. Conclusions: The coordinate positioning puncture method under robot-assisted CT-guidance can reach an accuracy that is comparable to that of the traditional manual CT-guided puncture method and with fewer CT scanning times accompanied with a lower radiation dosage.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of the robot-assisted computed tomography (CT)-guided coordinate positioning puncture method by phantom and animal experiments. Material and methods: In the phantom experiment, seven robot-assisted punctures were made to evaluate the accuracy of the method. In the animal experiment, 18 punctures (nine robotic and nine manual) were made in the livers of nine rabbits. The indicators, such as needle-tract length, angle deviation, puncture accuracy, number of scans required, and radiation exposure dose were compared between manual and robotic punctures. The paired-samples t-test was used for analysis. Results: In the phantom experiment, the mean accuracy of seven punctures was 2.67 mm. In the animal experiment, there was no significant difference in needle-tract length (32.58 mm vs. 34.04 mm, p =.606), angle deviation (17.21° vs. 21.23° p =.557) and puncture accuracy (8.42 vs. 8.77 mm, p =.851) between the two groups. However, the number CT scans required (2.44 vs. 3.33, p =.002), and the radiation exposure dose (772.98 vs. 1077.89 mGy/cm, p =.003) were lower in the robot group than in the manual group. Conclusions: The coordinate positioning puncture method under robot-assisted CT-guidance can reach an accuracy that is comparable to that of the traditional manual CT-guided puncture method and with fewer CT scanning times accompanied with a lower radiation dosage.
KW - CT-guidance
KW - Robot-assisted
KW - animal experiment
KW - coordinate positioning
KW - puncture
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85087616833
U2 - 10.1080/13645706.2020.1787451
DO - 10.1080/13645706.2020.1787451
M3 - 文章
C2 - 32633586
AN - SCOPUS:85087616833
SN - 1364-5706
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies
JF - Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies
ER -