TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparative investigation of flow structures in three-dimensional supercritical water and gas-solid fluidized bed via two-fluid model simulations
AU - Xi, Kenan
AU - Guo, Qiang
AU - Zhao, Lixing
AU - Lu, Youjun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - A comparative study of flow characteristics in three-dimensional supercritical water fluidized beds (SCWFB, 440–560 ℃, 22–26 MPa), cold gas-solid fluidized beds (CGSFB, 20 ℃, 0.1 MPa), and high-pressure and high-temperature gas-solid fluidized beds (HGSFB, 440–560 ℃, 22–26 MPa) was conducted via two-fluid model simulations across different fluid velocities, un-fluidized bed heights, pressures and temperatures. Bubble (or slug) and particle dynamics, fluid velocities, and bed expansions are investigated. The results show that, the drag forces of particulate phase are around 0.4 times particulate phase weights in SCWFB. Compared with CGSFB, SCWFB has lower minimum fluidization velocities, smaller bubble and slug sizes, more bubble and slug numbers, higher bed expansions and slug onset heights, and more uniform gas-solid interactions. Flow structures in SCWFB are similar to those in HGSFB. Pressure and temperature have less effects on the flow structures than fluid velocity and un-fluidized bed height in both SCWFB and HGSFB.
AB - A comparative study of flow characteristics in three-dimensional supercritical water fluidized beds (SCWFB, 440–560 ℃, 22–26 MPa), cold gas-solid fluidized beds (CGSFB, 20 ℃, 0.1 MPa), and high-pressure and high-temperature gas-solid fluidized beds (HGSFB, 440–560 ℃, 22–26 MPa) was conducted via two-fluid model simulations across different fluid velocities, un-fluidized bed heights, pressures and temperatures. Bubble (or slug) and particle dynamics, fluid velocities, and bed expansions are investigated. The results show that, the drag forces of particulate phase are around 0.4 times particulate phase weights in SCWFB. Compared with CGSFB, SCWFB has lower minimum fluidization velocities, smaller bubble and slug sizes, more bubble and slug numbers, higher bed expansions and slug onset heights, and more uniform gas-solid interactions. Flow structures in SCWFB are similar to those in HGSFB. Pressure and temperature have less effects on the flow structures than fluid velocity and un-fluidized bed height in both SCWFB and HGSFB.
KW - Comparative investigation
KW - Flow dynamics
KW - Fluidized bed
KW - Gas-solid
KW - Supercritical water
KW - Two-fluid model
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85122324860
U2 - 10.1016/j.supflu.2021.105515
DO - 10.1016/j.supflu.2021.105515
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85122324860
SN - 0896-8446
VL - 181
JO - Journal of Supercritical Fluids
JF - Journal of Supercritical Fluids
M1 - 105515
ER -