TY - JOUR
T1 - A Case-Study-Based Comparative Evaluation of Functional Analysis Paradigms in Aircraft System Design
AU - Li, Haomin
AU - Zhao, Meng
AU - Chen, Yong
AU - Xie, Youbai
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 by the authors.
PY - 2026/2
Y1 - 2026/2
N2 - Functional analysis plays a critical role in early-stage aircraft system design by defining system functions that guide downstream architectural development and verification. In practice, many design deficiencies originate not from incorrect physical realization but from incomplete or ambiguous functional definitions established at conceptual stages. This challenge is particularly pronounced in aircraft systems, where interaction- and physical-effect-induced functions tend to remain implicit and weakly justified. To address this issue, in this study, we conduct a case-study-based comparative evaluation of three functional analysis paradigms: design-theory-oriented functional decomposition, systems-engineering-based functional allocation, and scenario-driven functional analysis. Using an aircraft ground deceleration scenario as a controlled context, this comparison examines how different function-derivation mechanisms influence the identification and justification of interaction- and effect-induced functions. Through structured cross-paradigm comparison, three distinct and, in principle, reproducible derivation mechanisms, namely decomposition-driven, responsibility-driven, and physical-effect-driven, are identified. In this study, the physical-effect-driven mechanism is examined through an effect-strengthened implementation of the scenario-driven paradigm. While all paradigms consistently identify mission-oriented functions, the examined scenario-driven implementation enhances transparency in functional justification and improves sensitivity to interaction- and effect-induced functions, thereby reducing the risk of omission during conceptual design. By formalizing these derivation mechanisms and clarifying their complementary roles, this study contributes to a clearer methodological understanding of functional identification in early-stage complex system design, while providing practical guidance for methodological selection and integration in aircraft system design.
AB - Functional analysis plays a critical role in early-stage aircraft system design by defining system functions that guide downstream architectural development and verification. In practice, many design deficiencies originate not from incorrect physical realization but from incomplete or ambiguous functional definitions established at conceptual stages. This challenge is particularly pronounced in aircraft systems, where interaction- and physical-effect-induced functions tend to remain implicit and weakly justified. To address this issue, in this study, we conduct a case-study-based comparative evaluation of three functional analysis paradigms: design-theory-oriented functional decomposition, systems-engineering-based functional allocation, and scenario-driven functional analysis. Using an aircraft ground deceleration scenario as a controlled context, this comparison examines how different function-derivation mechanisms influence the identification and justification of interaction- and effect-induced functions. Through structured cross-paradigm comparison, three distinct and, in principle, reproducible derivation mechanisms, namely decomposition-driven, responsibility-driven, and physical-effect-driven, are identified. In this study, the physical-effect-driven mechanism is examined through an effect-strengthened implementation of the scenario-driven paradigm. While all paradigms consistently identify mission-oriented functions, the examined scenario-driven implementation enhances transparency in functional justification and improves sensitivity to interaction- and effect-induced functions, thereby reducing the risk of omission during conceptual design. By formalizing these derivation mechanisms and clarifying their complementary roles, this study contributes to a clearer methodological understanding of functional identification in early-stage complex system design, while providing practical guidance for methodological selection and integration in aircraft system design.
KW - aircraft system design
KW - comparative evaluation
KW - engineering applicability
KW - function-derivation mechanisms
KW - functional analysis
KW - scenario-driven analysis
KW - systems engineering
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105031379533
U2 - 10.3390/app16042028
DO - 10.3390/app16042028
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:105031379533
SN - 2076-3417
VL - 16
JO - Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
JF - Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
IS - 4
M1 - 2028
ER -