TY - GEN
T1 - Zero-Fine-Tuning Safety-First Closed-Loop Decision Making for UAVs
AU - Xiang, Lei
AU - Li, Donghe
AU - Yang, Ye
AU - Li, Haoxiang
AU - Yang, Qingyu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 IEEE.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Many UAV systems can already understand scenes and tasks, but they still fall short in two simple ways in real-world use. Task goals and safety rules are often written as free-form text, which makes it hard to verify what the system is actually allowed to do. When the model is unsure, it may still output actions that are not safe. In this work, we ask how a UAV can stay within a clear flight boundary and still make decisions that are reliable and traceable, without adding extra training cost. We design a simple decision loop: the task, current state, and safety rules are first written in a fixed template; the model then outputs an action together with a confidence score; if the confidence is low, the system chooses to hover or not execute the action; at the same time, an independent safety check blocks any action that may break the rules. On two public UAV test sequences, this loop keeps violations at zero and achieves higher decision accuracy than a standard baseline, while keeping the processing time in the same range, and a single threshold chosen on the first sequence can be reused on the second without any additional tuning.
AB - Many UAV systems can already understand scenes and tasks, but they still fall short in two simple ways in real-world use. Task goals and safety rules are often written as free-form text, which makes it hard to verify what the system is actually allowed to do. When the model is unsure, it may still output actions that are not safe. In this work, we ask how a UAV can stay within a clear flight boundary and still make decisions that are reliable and traceable, without adding extra training cost. We design a simple decision loop: the task, current state, and safety rules are first written in a fixed template; the model then outputs an action together with a confidence score; if the confidence is low, the system chooses to hover or not execute the action; at the same time, an independent safety check blocks any action that may break the rules. On two public UAV test sequences, this loop keeps violations at zero and achieves higher decision accuracy than a standard baseline, while keeping the processing time in the same range, and a single threshold chosen on the first sequence can be reused on the second without any additional tuning.
KW - confidence gating
KW - high-level decision making
KW - runtime safety
KW - structured prompts
KW - UAV
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105043940939
U2 - 10.1109/CCDC69976.2026.11560291
DO - 10.1109/CCDC69976.2026.11560291
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:105043940939
T3 - 38th Chinese Control and Decision Conference, CCDC 2026
SP - 7329
EP - 7334
BT - 38th Chinese Control and Decision Conference, CCDC 2026
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 38th Chinese Control and Decision Conference, CCDC 2026
Y2 - 15 May 2026 through 18 May 2026
ER -