Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Winners and losers of the Sino-US trade war from economic and environmental perspectives

  • Mingxi Du
  • , Lulu Chen
  • , Jintai Lin
  • , Yu Liu
  • , Kuishuang Feng
  • , Qiuyu Liu
  • , Yawen Liu
  • , Jingxu Wang
  • , Ruijing Ni
  • , Yu Zhao
  • , Wei Si
  • , Ying Li
  • , Hao Kong
  • , Hongjian Weng
  • , Mengyao Liu
  • , Jamiu Adetayo Adeniran
  • Peking University
  • CAS - Institutes of Science and Development
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Shandong University
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • Université du Québec à Montréal
  • Nanjing University
  • China Agricultural University
  • China Animal Disease Control Center
  • Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

The ongoing trade war between the United States and China is having profound impacts on the global economy. As recent studies have found substantial amounts of carbon dioxide and air pollution embedded in the global supply chains, the Sino-US trade war may also affect emissions and health burdens worldwide, which remains poorly understood. Here, we estimate the potential changes in gross domestic product (GDP), anthropogenic emissions and particulate matter (PM2.5) related premature deaths worldwide under two Sino-US trade war scenarios. We find that for the US and China, the trade war would reduce their GDP and, less significantly, emissions and mortality, suggesting that the trade war is not an effective means of environmental protection. The trade war would increase both GDP and mortality in many developing regions, because of their increased production of goods targeted in the Sino-US trade war. Surprisingly, Western Europe and Latin America and Caribbean would have higher GDP but lower emissions and mortality, an economic and environmental win-win outcome as a net result of the complex changes in the global supply chains. Neighbour regions of the US and China such as Canada, Japan and Korea would also have higher GDP but lower mortality, because of reduced atmospheric transboundary transport from the US and China overcompensating for increased local emissions of these neighbours. The complex consequences of the Sino-US trade war highlight the strong inter-regional and economic-environmental linkage in support of a global collaborative strategy to foster economic growth and environmental protection.

Original languageEnglish
Article number094032
JournalEnvironmental Research Letters
Volume15
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2020
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

Keywords

  • Air pollution
  • Atmospheric transport
  • International trade

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Winners and losers of the Sino-US trade war from economic and environmental perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this