Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Values, Norms, and Peer Effects on Weight Status

  • Peng Nie
  • , Wencke Gwozdz
  • , Lucia Reisch
  • , Alfonso Sousa-Poza
  • University of Hohenheim
  • Copenhagen Business School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study uses data from the European Social Survey in order to test the Prinstein-Dodge hypothesis that posits that peer effects may be larger in collectivistic than in individualistic societies. When defining individualism and collectivism at the country level, our results show that peer effects on obesity are indeed larger in collectivistic than in individualistic societies. However, when defining individualism and collectivism with individual values based on the Shalom Schwartz universal values theory, we find little support for this hypothesis.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2849674
JournalJournal of Obesity
Volume2017
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Values, Norms, and Peer Effects on Weight Status'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this