Three-phase four-leg drive for DC-biased sinusoidal current vernier reluctance machine

  • An Li
  • , Dong Jiang
  • , Zihan Gao
  • , Wubin Kong
  • , Shaofeng Jia
  • , Ronghai Qu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper proposes a three-phase four-leg drive for dc-biased sinusoidal current vernier reluctance machine (DC-VRM). By adding an asymmetrical neutral leg to the conventional three-phase inverter, the dc field excitation current can be generated. Compared to the open-winding inverter (conventional drive topology), the three-phase four-leg inverter greatly reduces the number of power devices, and the asymmetrical neutral leg does not have short-circuit straight-through risk. The topology ensures that the stator current can flow in both directions and maximum torque per copper loss can be obtained in DC-VRM. Equivalent carrier-based pulsewidth modulation (PWM) strategy is proposed to produce the dc-biased sinusoidal current and maximize the dc bus utilization. The proposed carrier-based PWM has several different equivalent methods. Compared to the conventional DC-VRM drive, the power loss of the proposed drive with equivalent space vector PWM (SVPWM) can be reduced significantly and can be further reduced by discontinuous PWM minimum (DPWMMIN) in the rated condition. The proposed drive has the characteristics of low cost, high power density, and high efficiency compared to the conventional DC-VRM drive.

Original languageEnglish
Article number8632675
Pages (from-to)2758-2769
Number of pages12
JournalIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2019

Keywords

  • Carrier-based pulsewidth modulation (PWM)
  • DPWM
  • SVPWM
  • dc-biased sinusoidal current vernier reluctance machine (DC-VRM)
  • motor drive
  • three-phase four-leg inverter

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Three-phase four-leg drive for DC-biased sinusoidal current vernier reluctance machine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this