TY - JOUR
T1 - Thermodynamic and economic comparison of novel parallel and serial combined cooling and power systems based on sCO2 cycle
AU - Chen, Kang
AU - Zheng, Shaoxiong
AU - Du, Yang
AU - Fan, Gang
AU - Dai, Yiping
AU - Chen, Haichao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2021/1/15
Y1 - 2021/1/15
N2 - Based on the principle of cascade utilization of energy, the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and the absorption refrigeration cycle (ARC) were adopted to recover the waste heat from supercritical CO2 (sCO2) cycle. By changing the configurations of ORC and ARC, two combined cooling and power (CCP) system were proposed: parallel system (PCCP) and serial system (SCCP). Besides, the control valves are introduced into both systems to control the seasonal operation of ARC. Meanwhile, the performance comparison was investigated in the aspects of thermodynamics and economy. The multi-objective optimization was carried out to maximize system exergy efficiency and minimize system unit cost. It can be observed that the SCCP presents a larger exergy efficiency of 62.62% and a cheaper equivalent unit cost of 5.60 $∙kWh−1, which are 0.43% higher and 0.19 $∙kWh−1 lower than that of the PCCP, respectively. However, the PCCP could generate an additional refrigeration capacity of 116.245 kW than SCCP when ARC operates. The SCCP is finally recommended due to a cheaper equivalent unit cost and a larger exergy efficiency.
AB - Based on the principle of cascade utilization of energy, the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and the absorption refrigeration cycle (ARC) were adopted to recover the waste heat from supercritical CO2 (sCO2) cycle. By changing the configurations of ORC and ARC, two combined cooling and power (CCP) system were proposed: parallel system (PCCP) and serial system (SCCP). Besides, the control valves are introduced into both systems to control the seasonal operation of ARC. Meanwhile, the performance comparison was investigated in the aspects of thermodynamics and economy. The multi-objective optimization was carried out to maximize system exergy efficiency and minimize system unit cost. It can be observed that the SCCP presents a larger exergy efficiency of 62.62% and a cheaper equivalent unit cost of 5.60 $∙kWh−1, which are 0.43% higher and 0.19 $∙kWh−1 lower than that of the PCCP, respectively. However, the PCCP could generate an additional refrigeration capacity of 116.245 kW than SCCP when ARC operates. The SCCP is finally recommended due to a cheaper equivalent unit cost and a larger exergy efficiency.
KW - Combined system
KW - Multi-objective optimization
KW - Supercritical carbon dioxide
KW - Thermodynamic and economic analysis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85094187233
U2 - 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119008
DO - 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119008
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85094187233
SN - 0360-5442
VL - 215
JO - Energy
JF - Energy
M1 - 119008
ER -