TY - JOUR
T1 - Thermo-economic Analysis for Directly-buried Pipes Insulation of District Heating Piping Systems
AU - Zhang, Lianying
AU - Wang, Zhenni
AU - Yang, Xiaohu
AU - Jin, Liwen
AU - Zhang, Qunli
AU - Hu, Wenju
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Energy losses in district heating pipeline networks can be reduced considerably using insulation materials. In this study, the optimum insulation thickness of direct burial laying used in district heating pipeline networks, energy savings, and payback periods are calculated for various pipe diameters, fuel types and soil depth in the city of Xi'an/China by software MATLAB depending on Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) method. The results show that optimum insulation thicknesses vary between 0.060 and 0.121 m, energy savings vary between 36.395 $/ m and 194.682 $/m, and payback periods vary between 0.445 and 1.691 years. When the rock wool is used as the insulation material and the soil depth is 1 m, the highest value of energy savings is reached in 500 mm nominal pipe size for fuel-oil fuel type, while the lowest value is obtained in 100 mm for geothermal energy. Therefore, the selection of optimum thickness for different pipes diameters and fuels types is particularly vital for the economic and environmental advantages.
AB - Energy losses in district heating pipeline networks can be reduced considerably using insulation materials. In this study, the optimum insulation thickness of direct burial laying used in district heating pipeline networks, energy savings, and payback periods are calculated for various pipe diameters, fuel types and soil depth in the city of Xi'an/China by software MATLAB depending on Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) method. The results show that optimum insulation thicknesses vary between 0.060 and 0.121 m, energy savings vary between 36.395 $/ m and 194.682 $/m, and payback periods vary between 0.445 and 1.691 years. When the rock wool is used as the insulation material and the soil depth is 1 m, the highest value of energy savings is reached in 500 mm nominal pipe size for fuel-oil fuel type, while the lowest value is obtained in 100 mm for geothermal energy. Therefore, the selection of optimum thickness for different pipes diameters and fuels types is particularly vital for the economic and environmental advantages.
KW - District heating
KW - directly-buried pipes
KW - optimum insulation thickness
KW - pipe insulation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85020712169
U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.759
DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.759
M3 - 会议文章
AN - SCOPUS:85020712169
SN - 1876-6102
VL - 105
SP - 3369
EP - 3376
JO - Energy Procedia
JF - Energy Procedia
T2 - 8th International Conference on Applied Energy, ICAE 2016
Y2 - 8 October 2016 through 11 October 2016
ER -