Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The responses of microbial extracellular enzyme activities to soil sample storage conditions across different soil types

  • Panpan Liu
  • , Jiacong Zhou
  • , Chris Freeman
  • , Mallavarapu Megharaj
  • , Kyungjin Min
  • , Linchuan Fang
  • , Gangsheng Wang
  • , Lars Elsgaard
  • , Nicolas Fanin
  • , Hojeong Kang
  • , Taiki Mori
  • , Jianwei Li
  • , Daryl L. Moorhead
  • , Yongxing Cui
  • , Yangyang Li
  • , Dong Wang
  • , Zhao Jin
  • , Xiaojun Shi
  • , Ji Chen
  • Southwest University
  • CAS - Institute of Earth Environment
  • Bangor University
  • University of Newcastle
  • Seoul National University
  • Wuhan University of Technology
  • Wuhan University
  • Aarhus University
  • INRAE
  • North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power
  • Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute
  • Tennessee State University
  • University of Toledo
  • Peking University
  • Free University of Berlin
  • Henan University
  • School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering
  • Guanzhong Plain Ecological Environment Change and Comprehensive Treatment National Observation and Research Station

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Storage at −20 °C optimally preserves hydrolytic enzyme activities in all soils. Oxidative enzyme responses to storage conditions are highly soil-specific. Storage dictates hydrolytic activity, while climate drives oxidative enzymes. Tailoring storage protocols to soil and enzyme types ensures cross-study comparability. Microbial extracellular enzymes are key indicators of soil biogeochemical functioning, yet their sensitivity to storage conditions remains unclear and limits cross-study comparability. We evaluated how three storage conditions (−20 °C, air-drying, and freeze-drying) affect hydrolytic and oxidative enzyme activities across forest soils spanning an acidic-to-alkaline pH gradient in China (Acrisols, Luvisols, and Calcisols). Storage at −20 °C consistently preserved higher hydrolytic activities, whereas air-drying and freeze-drying caused significant reductions across all soils. Conversely, oxidative enzymes showed soil-specific responses: -20 °C was optimal for Acrisols; both -20 °C and freeze-drying outperformed air-drying in Luvisols; while storage conditions little affected Calcisols. Multivariate analysis revealed that, although both enzyme types were influenced by key soil properties (e.g., pH, carbon, nutrients), their primary drivers differed. Hydrolytic activities were predominantly governed by storage conditions, whereas oxidative activities were mainly regulated by climatic factors (temperature and precipitation). These findings underscore the necessity of tailoring storage protocols to specific soil and enzyme types. Standardizing and explicitly reporting these conditions will improve the reproducibility of enzyme assays, providing a robust methodological foundation for future ecological research.

Original languageEnglish
Article number260480
JournalSoil Ecology Letters
Volume8
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2026
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • ecosystem function
  • hydrolytic enzyme
  • oxidative enzyme
  • soil organic matter decomposition
  • soil pH gradient
  • soil sample storage

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The responses of microbial extracellular enzyme activities to soil sample storage conditions across different soil types'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this