Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The impacts of democracy on innovation: Revisited evidence

  • Quan Jing Wang
  • , Gen Fu Feng
  • , Hai Jie Wang
  • , Chun Ping Chang
  • Zhengzhou University
  • Shih Chien University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

142 Scopus citations

Abstract

This research empirically tests the Popper hypothesis (2012) by utilizing panel data that cover 132 countries over the time period 1980–2017 and via panel GMM estimation in order to investigate the causal link from democracy to innovation, which is captured by two comprehensive variables, patent application and trademark application. Aside from the relationship between democracy and innovation, we further explore whether or not the change of democracy significantly influences innovation, whether the influence of democracy on innovation varies among different kinds of democracy or autocracy, and hence pay more attention on factors such as economic development level, economic performance, globalization, and international trade, and how do they change the democracy's impact on technical innovation. To confirm credibility, we carry out the robustness test by changing the measurement of democracy, the measurement of innovation and deleting extreme values. In summary, while democracy promotes innovation performance, autocracy generally exhibits lower technological innovation performance. This study provides evidence on the influence of democracy on innovation being affected by other factors such as those stated above.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102333
JournalTechnovation
Volume108
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

Keywords

  • Democracy
  • Innovation
  • Panel GMM
  • Political regime

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impacts of democracy on innovation: Revisited evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this