Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effect of pulse current cathodic protection on cathodic disbondment of epoxy coatings

  • Jue Wang
  • , Junying Hu
  • , Chenrong Gu
  • , Yisheng Mou
  • , Jiansheng Yu
  • , Xiankang Zhong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

For coated pipelines with cathodic protection, cathodic delamination has been judged as the main reason of coating delamination. This work aims to use the pulse current cathodic protection (PCCP) to mitigate the coating cathodic delamination. Cathodic delamination tests, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and wire beam electrode method (WBE) were used to study the effect of PCCP on the mitigation of coating disbondment. The results show that PCCP could successfully retard the cathodic delamination rates of organic coatings. Under different cathodic protection potential, the delamination area of the coating protected using PCCP is much smaller than that using direct current cathodic protection. With the increasing pulse frequency and duty ratio, the mitigation effect decreases. Within the range of pulse frequency from 5 Hz to 500 Hz and duty ratio from 0.1 to 0.9, the results of cathodic delamination tests and WBE tests indicate that when the cathodic potential is −1.5 V, the mitigation effect reaches the maximum with the pulse frequency of 5 Hz and the duty ratio of 0.1. PCCP alleviates cathodic delamination of coating mainly by intermittently shifting the surface polarization potential to positive direction and reducing the consumption of cathodic reaction charge.

Original languageEnglish
Article number107001
JournalProgress in Organic Coatings
Volume170
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cathodic protection
  • Coating delamination
  • Hydrogen evolution
  • Wire-beam electrodes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of pulse current cathodic protection on cathodic disbondment of epoxy coatings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this