TY - JOUR
T1 - Tailored microform cleft lip repair
T2 - Personalizing small incisions, orbicularis reconstruction, and rhinoplasty
AU - He, Lin
AU - Yu, Xueyuan
AU - Liu, Xiangyu
AU - Chen, Wendy
AU - Shu, Maoguo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background: In the last decade, many surgeons have reported their perspectives on microform cleft lip repair, including techniques for incision placement and size, philtral reconstruction, and nasal base reconstruction. This interest demonstrates continued controversy in the repair of microform cleft lip. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort of patients from 2010 to 2016. The authors included patients with microform cleft lip repaired by our described technique who had both preoperative photographs, as well as photographs taken at >1-year follow-up. Patient outcomes were assessed through anthropometric measurements and also subjectively by 3 senior residents of plastic surgery. Results: The inclusion criteria yielded 36 microform cleft lip patients. Most patients were satisfied with their results. Regarding subjective assessment, the scar appearance and symmetry was fairly good. Objective measurements indicated excellent symmetry, with the cleft side achieving 92.58%of the height andmeasurements of the non-cleft side. Conclusions: Our method of combining labial muscle reconstruction through a personalized, small incision effectively corrects microform cleft lip deformity with minimal scar burden.
AB - Background: In the last decade, many surgeons have reported their perspectives on microform cleft lip repair, including techniques for incision placement and size, philtral reconstruction, and nasal base reconstruction. This interest demonstrates continued controversy in the repair of microform cleft lip. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort of patients from 2010 to 2016. The authors included patients with microform cleft lip repaired by our described technique who had both preoperative photographs, as well as photographs taken at >1-year follow-up. Patient outcomes were assessed through anthropometric measurements and also subjectively by 3 senior residents of plastic surgery. Results: The inclusion criteria yielded 36 microform cleft lip patients. Most patients were satisfied with their results. Regarding subjective assessment, the scar appearance and symmetry was fairly good. Objective measurements indicated excellent symmetry, with the cleft side achieving 92.58%of the height andmeasurements of the non-cleft side. Conclusions: Our method of combining labial muscle reconstruction through a personalized, small incision effectively corrects microform cleft lip deformity with minimal scar burden.
KW - Microform cleft lip
KW - Orbicularis reconstruction
KW - Small incisions
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85069807677
U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005345
DO - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005345
M3 - 文章
C2 - 31299758
AN - SCOPUS:85069807677
SN - 1049-2275
VL - 30
SP - 1520
EP - 1524
JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
IS - 5
ER -