Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Suppression of Secondary Electron Emission from Nickel Surface by Graphene Composites Based on First-Principles Method

  • Min Peng
  • , Chang Nan
  • , Dawei Wang
  • , Meng Cao
  • , Liang Zhang
  • , Laijun Liu
  • , Chunliang Liu
  • , Dangqi Fang
  • , Yiqi Zhang
  • , Yonggui Zhai
  • , Yongdong Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Secondary electron emission (SEE) is a fundamental phenomenon of particle/surface interaction, and the multipactor effect induced by SEE can result in disastrous impacts on the performance of microwave devices. To suppress the SEE-induced multipactor, an Ni (111) surface covered with a monolayer of graphene was proposed and studied theoretically via the density functional theory (DFT) method. The calculation results indicated that redistribution of the electron density at the graphene/Ni (111) interface led to variations in the work function and the probability of SEE. To validate the theoretical results, experiments were performed to analyze secondary electron yield (SEY). The measurements showed a significant decrease in the SEY on an Ni (111) surface covered with a monolayer of graphene, accompanied by a decrease in the work function, which is consistent with the statistical evidence of a strong correlation between the work function and SEY of metals. A discussion was given on explaining the experimental phenomenon using theoretical calculation results, where the empty orbitals lead to an electron trapping effect, thereby reducing SEY.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2550
JournalNanomaterials
Volume13
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2023

Keywords

  • density functional theory (DFT)
  • graphene
  • secondary electron yield (SEY)
  • theoretical mechanism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Suppression of Secondary Electron Emission from Nickel Surface by Graphene Composites Based on First-Principles Method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this