TY - JOUR
T1 - Super elastic-plastic behavior of the surface grooves resulting in tensile anisotropy of 3D-printed elastomers
AU - Lin, Xiang
AU - Wu, Shuang
AU - Wang, Dongrui
AU - Gong, Min
AU - Zhang, Liang
AU - Liu, Yao
AU - Zhang, Liqun
AU - Lu, Yonglai
AU - Wang, Runguo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2024/2/25
Y1 - 2024/2/25
N2 - It is popularly acknowledged that additively manufactured polymer parts normally demonstrate mechanical anisotropy owing to their layer-wise characteristics with insufficient interface bonding. For 3D-printed rigid thermoplastic objects, such anisotropy has been largely reduced or even eliminated by accurately measuring the actual load-bearing area using microscopy technology. However, this method becomes not effective anymore when it comes to the 3D-printed elastomers, of which the origin of mechanical anisotropy is rarely regarded in literature. For this reason, we proposed a supplementary explanation of the tensile anisotropy based on an investigation of the mechanical dependence of 3D-printed thermoplastic polyurethane on the formed microscopic features. Seven categories of tensile specimens with varying microscopic features, including layer counts, layer height, surface groove angle, and bonding area, were fabricated by material-extrusion printing technology. The distinctive deformation process of these features during tensile testing process was analyzed, on which the dependence of both the stress-strain behavior of the as-printed elastomers and their failure mechanism were discussed with respect to the elastic-plastic behavior of elastomer. Ultimately, the tensile anisotropy was found to be primarily dependent on the surface grooves which contribute to a significant stress concentration effect during the tensile process.
AB - It is popularly acknowledged that additively manufactured polymer parts normally demonstrate mechanical anisotropy owing to their layer-wise characteristics with insufficient interface bonding. For 3D-printed rigid thermoplastic objects, such anisotropy has been largely reduced or even eliminated by accurately measuring the actual load-bearing area using microscopy technology. However, this method becomes not effective anymore when it comes to the 3D-printed elastomers, of which the origin of mechanical anisotropy is rarely regarded in literature. For this reason, we proposed a supplementary explanation of the tensile anisotropy based on an investigation of the mechanical dependence of 3D-printed thermoplastic polyurethane on the formed microscopic features. Seven categories of tensile specimens with varying microscopic features, including layer counts, layer height, surface groove angle, and bonding area, were fabricated by material-extrusion printing technology. The distinctive deformation process of these features during tensile testing process was analyzed, on which the dependence of both the stress-strain behavior of the as-printed elastomers and their failure mechanism were discussed with respect to the elastic-plastic behavior of elastomer. Ultimately, the tensile anisotropy was found to be primarily dependent on the surface grooves which contribute to a significant stress concentration effect during the tensile process.
KW - Additive manufacturing
KW - Elastomer
KW - Mechanical properties
KW - Tensile anisotropy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85184995853
U2 - 10.1016/j.addma.2024.104030
DO - 10.1016/j.addma.2024.104030
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85184995853
SN - 2214-8604
VL - 82
JO - Additive Manufacturing
JF - Additive Manufacturing
M1 - 104030
ER -