Abstract
There has been a shift to less carbon intensive fuels such as natural gas to meet energy demand due to increasing pressure to cut CO2 emissions. This has prompted a need to assess unconventional and contaminated natural gas reserves (which contains CO2 concentration of 20 mol% or more). The CO2 capture process with MEA as the solvent is mostly adopted to treat contaminated natural gas. In this study, the option of using a blend of ionic liquids (IL) and MEA as a promising solvent in the process was investigated through modelling and simulation. A detailed rate-based model was developed for both MEA (30 wt%) solvent and IL (30 wt%)-MEA (30 wt%) blend using Aspen Plus® to assess both process and economic performances. The 1-Butylpyridinium ([bpy][BF4]) ionic liquid was selected in this study. The physiochemical properties of [bpy][BF4], predicted using Aspen Plus®, showed good accuracy compared with experimental data. The results from this study showed about 15% and 7.44% lower energy consumption in the reboiler duty and CO2 removal cost respectively with aqueous [bpy][BF4]-MEA solvent compared to 30 wt% MEA solvent. It is concluded that the aqueous [bpy][BF4]-MEA solvent is therefore a promising solvent that could replace 30 wt% MEA solvent in this process.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 135-146 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Fuel |
| Volume | 236 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 15 Jan 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Keywords
- CO removal
- Chemical absorption
- Ionic liquid
- MEA
- Natural gas processing
- Process simulation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Study of CO2 removal in natural gas process using mixture of ionic liquid and MEA through process simulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver