Safety, Efficacy, and Biomarker Analysis of Toripalimab in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from a Multicenter Phase II Trial POLARIS-03

  • Xinan Sheng
  • , Haige Chen
  • , Bin Hu
  • , Xudong Yao
  • , Ziling Liu
  • , Xin Yao
  • , Hongqian Guo
  • , Yi Hu
  • , Zhigang Ji
  • , Hong Luo
  • , Benkang Shi
  • , Jiyan Liu
  • , Jin Wu
  • , Fang Jian Zhou
  • , Zhisong He
  • , Jinhai Fan
  • , Weifeng Wang
  • , Hui Feng
  • , Sheng Yao
  • , Patricia Keegan
  • Yiran Huang, Jun Guo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Immunotherapy offers a second-line option for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who failed standard therapy, but the biomarkers for predicting response remain to be explored.This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and correlative biomarker of toripalimab in patients with previously treated mUC. Patients and Methods: Patients with mUC received toripalimab 3 mg/kg Q2W. Clinical response was assessed every 8 weeks by an independent review committee per RECIST v1.1. Tumor PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and other biomarkers were evaluated. Results: Among the intention-to-treat population (n = 151), 85% of the patients experienced treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) and 20% experienced grade 3 and above TRAE. The objective response rate (ORR) was 26% with a disease control rate (DCR) of 45%. The median duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 19.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.9-not estimable], 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.8-3.6), and 14.4 months (95% CI, 9.3-23.1), respectively. Both PD-L1 and TMB-high (10 mutations/Mb as the cutoff) patients had better ORR than PD-L1_ patients (42% vs. 17%, P=0.002) and TMB-low patients (48% vs. 22%, P = 0.014), respectively. The TMB-high group also showed better PFS (12.9 vs. 1.8 months, P < 0.001) and OS (not reached versus 10.0 months, P=0.018) than the TMB-low group. Conclusions: Toripalimab has demonstrated encouraging clinical activity in the second-line treatment ofmUCwith a manageable safety profile. PD-L1 expression and TMB were two independent biomarkers in the study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)489-497
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safety, Efficacy, and Biomarker Analysis of Toripalimab in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from a Multicenter Phase II Trial POLARIS-03'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this