TY - JOUR
T1 - Rapid characterization of a novel taspine derivative-HMQ1611 binding to EGFR by a cell membrane chromatography method
AU - Du, Hui
AU - Lv, Nan
AU - Wang, Sicen
AU - He, Langchong
PY - 2013/5
Y1 - 2013/5
N2 - A new high-expression endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) cell membrane chromatography (CMC) method was applied to recognize the ligands acting on EGFR specifically, and investigate the affinity of gefitinib/HMQ1611 to EGFR. In the self and direct competitive assay, gefitinib/HMQ1611 was used as a competitor in the mobile phase to evaluate the effect of the competitor's concentrations on the retention of the ligands, respectively, and the competition between gefitinib and HMQ1611 binding to EGFR was also been examined. The retention behavior indicated that gefitinib had one type of binding sites on the EGFR, and the equilibrium dissociation constant (K D) was (9.11 ± 1.89) × 10-6 M; HMQ1611 had two major binding regions on the EGFR, and the KD values obtained from the model were (2.39 ± 0.33) × 10-7 and (3.87 ± 0.93) × 10-5 M for HMQ1611 at the high- and low-affinity sites, respectively. The competition between gefitinib and HMQ1611 occurred at the low-affinity sites on the EGFR. The low-affinity sites were of higher concentrations and contributed to a much larger part of retention of HMQ1611. The results suggested that gefitinib and HMQ1611 competed for the common binding sites on the EGFR, no matter the ligand was used as an analyte or a competitor.
AB - A new high-expression endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) cell membrane chromatography (CMC) method was applied to recognize the ligands acting on EGFR specifically, and investigate the affinity of gefitinib/HMQ1611 to EGFR. In the self and direct competitive assay, gefitinib/HMQ1611 was used as a competitor in the mobile phase to evaluate the effect of the competitor's concentrations on the retention of the ligands, respectively, and the competition between gefitinib and HMQ1611 binding to EGFR was also been examined. The retention behavior indicated that gefitinib had one type of binding sites on the EGFR, and the equilibrium dissociation constant (K D) was (9.11 ± 1.89) × 10-6 M; HMQ1611 had two major binding regions on the EGFR, and the KD values obtained from the model were (2.39 ± 0.33) × 10-7 and (3.87 ± 0.93) × 10-5 M for HMQ1611 at the high- and low-affinity sites, respectively. The competition between gefitinib and HMQ1611 occurred at the low-affinity sites on the EGFR. The low-affinity sites were of higher concentrations and contributed to a much larger part of retention of HMQ1611. The results suggested that gefitinib and HMQ1611 competed for the common binding sites on the EGFR, no matter the ligand was used as an analyte or a competitor.
KW - Binding site
KW - Cell membrane chromatography
KW - Epidermal growth factor receptor
KW - HMQ1611
KW - Self and direct competitive assay
KW - Zonal elution
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84877982725
U2 - 10.2174/1386207311316040006
DO - 10.2174/1386207311316040006
M3 - 文章
C2 - 23270402
AN - SCOPUS:84877982725
SN - 1386-2073
VL - 16
SP - 324
EP - 329
JO - Combinatorial Chemistry and High Throughput Screening
JF - Combinatorial Chemistry and High Throughput Screening
IS - 4
ER -